KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002684176},
author={Shim SooKyung},
title={Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』},
journal={日本硏究},
issn={1229-6309},
year={2021},
number={54},
pages={207-227},
doi={10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207}

TY - JOUR
AU - Shim SooKyung
TI - Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』
JO - 日本硏究
PY - 2021
VL - null
IS - 54
PB - The Center for Japanese Studies
SP - 207
EP - 227
SN - 1229-6309
AB - Kenzaburou Oe published “Seventeen” and “Seijisyounen Sisu(Political boy dies)” based on the murder of the Asanuma Socialist Party chairman in 1960, but “Seijisyounen Sisu” was censored from printing for a long time due to a right-wing protest. A 17-year-old boy who was dissatisfied with the Shichirou Fukazawa's “Furyu mutan(The Tale of an Elegant Dream)” broke into the president's home at Chuokoron-sha, killed the housekeeper, and seriously injured his wife. As a result, “Furyu mutan" was also censored for a long time. For this reasons, these two works are sometimes referred to as lese majesty literary works, but in the 2010s, the two works were printed(“Furyu mutan” is an e-book in 2011, “Seijisyonen Sisu” is a paper book in 2018). This study compared Kenzaburo Oe’s “Seventeen” and “Seizisyonen Sisu” with Shichirou Fukazawa’s “Furyu mutan”, and discussed the incidents and fetter of expression related to both works, and the difference and meanings of the emperor’s discourse in both works. This study also analyzed the ambivalent feelings towards the Japanese emperor Postwar.
KW - Imperial family taboo;lese majesty literature;freedom of expression;popular emperor system;ambivalence of feelings for the emperor
DO - 10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207
ER -

Shim SooKyung. (2021). Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』. 日本硏究, 54, 207-227.

Shim SooKyung. 2021, "Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』", 日本硏究, no.54, pp.207-227. Available from: doi:10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207

Shim SooKyung "Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』" 日本硏究 54 pp.207-227 (2021) : 207.

Shim SooKyung. Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』. 2021; 54 : 207-227. Available from: doi:10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207

Shim SooKyung. "Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』" 日本硏究 no.54(2021) : 207-227.doi: 10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207

Shim SooKyung. Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』. 日本硏究, 54, 207-227. doi: 10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207

Shim SooKyung. Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』. 日本硏究. 2021; 54 207-227. doi: 10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207

Shim SooKyung. Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』. 2021; 54 : 207-227. Available from: doi:10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207

Shim SooKyung. "Imperial family taboo and inconvenience of expression -From the viewpoint of Kenzaburou Oe’s 『Seventeen』duology & Shichirou Hukazawa’s 『Furyu mutan』" 日本硏究 no.54(2021) : 207-227.doi: 10.20404/jscau.2021.02.54.207