KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001787135},
author={Ahn Chi-Young},
title={The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory},
journal={중앙사론},
issn={1229-3652},
year={2013},
number={37},
pages={359-391}

TY - JOUR
AU - Ahn Chi-Young
TI - The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory
JO - 중앙사론
PY - 2013
VL - null
IS - 37
PB - Institute for Historical Studies at Chung-Ang University
SP - 359
EP - 391
SN - 1229-3652
AB - There has been a lot of political controversies about the reform agenda in Chinese early reform years. This article focus on the controversy over the stages of the socialist development theory which is one of the most important but little known. This article investigate the two backgrounds of the controversy. One is the controversies over the stages of the socialism after the establishment of the PRC especially with the formulation of the general line for the transition to socialism in 1953. The other is the theory controversies around the early reform year over the reform agenda. This article investigate the processes of the controversy over the stages of the socialist development theory. The controversy was started by the article "On the Problem of the Social Development Stages after the Proletariat Revolution," which was co-written by Su Shaozi and Feng Ranrui. After the publication of the article Hu Qiaomu-the chinese theorist-Czar and Deng liqun-the conservative ideologue criticised that the article refused that the PRC was the socialist state. But the criticism was prevented by the CCP Central Committee Propaganda Department, because it concluded that Su Shaozi and Feng Ranrui did not assert that the PRC was not socialist country. But until the deepening of the reform in 1984 and the settlement of the theory of the primary stage of the socialism, Hu Qiaomu repeated his critics intermittently. Although there had repeated the anti-Liberalization Campaign, Hu Qiamu's critics on the stages of the socialist development theory did not diffused. That reflected the characteristics of the Chinese reform. On the aspect that the political changes did not correspond to the economic changes, the Chinese reform was the economic reform without the political reform. But it means what was the need for economic reform was accepted notwithstanding not corresponding to the political reform. The stages of the socialist development theory was needed for the economic reform although it had some contradiction to the socialist theory.
KW - The stages of the socialist development theory;the chinese reform;the political controversy;the primary stage of socialism;Hu Qiaomu
DO -
UR -
ER -

Ahn Chi-Young. (2013). The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory. 중앙사론, 37, 359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young. 2013, "The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory", 중앙사론, no.37, pp.359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young "The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory" 중앙사론 37 pp.359-391 (2013) : 359.

Ahn Chi-Young. The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory. 2013; 37 : 359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young. "The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory" 중앙사론 no.37(2013) : 359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young. The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory. 중앙사론, 37, 359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young. The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory. 중앙사론. 2013; 37 359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young. The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory. 2013; 37 : 359-391.

Ahn Chi-Young. "The Chinese Political Controversy in the Early Reform Years and the Stages of the Socialist Development Theory" 중앙사론 no.37(2013) : 359-391.