@article{ART002189742},
author={위의정},
title={A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”},
journal={Journal of Chinese Language and Literature},
issn={1225-083X},
year={2016},
number={73},
pages={319-337},
doi={10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319}
TY - JOUR
AU - 위의정
TI - A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”
JO - Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
PY - 2016
VL - null
IS - 73
PB - Chinese Literary Society Of Yeong Nam
SP - 319
EP - 337
SN - 1225-083X
AB - According to Construction Grammar, this paper analyzes the constructional meaning of “qu+VP” and “VP+qu”. On this basis, we also discussed the interchange of “qu+VP”, “VP+qu”. In addition, we also put forward some suggestions on the teaching of “qu+VP” and “VP+qu”.
Through the analysis, we believe that the construction meaning of “qu+VP” structure can be summarized as “reporting the occurrence of the purpose of the incident,” and “VP+qu” can be summarized as the purpose of the event notice.
Because “qu+VP” and “VP+qu” have different constructional meanings, their expressive functions also have significant differences. 1) “qu+VP” and “VP+qu” have narrative functions, but the angle of narration is different. Specifically, “qu+VP” focuses on the event itself, while “VP+qu” focuses on the agent's displacement event. In many cases, the choice of “qu+VP” and “VP+qu” is related to the perspective of the speaker, while the speaker's perspective depends on the specific context.
2) Different from “qu+VP”, “VP+qu” has modal expression function. In different contexts, “VP+qu” can express the modal meaning of “declaring”, “making” and “persuading” respectively. These modal meanings have a restraining effect on “qu+VP” and “VP+qu”.
KW - 目的构式(the pursose construction);“去+VP”(“qu+VP”);“VP+去”(“VP+qu”);语用分析(Pragmatic Analysis);情态义 (Modal ity);教学对策(Teaching countermeasures)
DO - 10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
ER -
위의정. (2016). A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 73, 319-337.
위의정. 2016, "A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”", Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, no.73, pp.319-337. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
위의정 "A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 73 pp.319-337 (2016) : 319.
위의정. A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”. 2016; 73 : 319-337. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
위의정. "A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.73(2016) : 319-337.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
위의정. A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 73, 319-337. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
위의정. A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature. 2016; 73 319-337. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
위의정. A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”. 2016; 73 : 319-337. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
위의정. "A Pragmatic Analysis of “qu + VP” and “VP + qu”" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.73(2016) : 319-337.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..73.201612.319
