@article{ART001796883},
author={이동춘},
title={A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime},
journal={The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics},
issn={1229-8387},
year={2013},
number={26},
pages={7-54}
TY - JOUR
AU - 이동춘
TI - A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime
JO - The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics
PY - 2013
VL - null
IS - 26
PB - The Society Of Korean Christian Social Ethics
SP - 7
EP - 54
SN - 1229-8387
AB - This article is focusing a christian ethical criticism on unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime. However, I think, it is too early time that is critics about unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime because of on a point in time only 4 months that departure of Park Geun-hye regime. In spite of, this article has a dream that ‘the Korean peninsula trust(credit) process’ of Park Geun-hye regime comes true. So this was able to criticise ‘the Korean peninsula trust(credit) process’ of Park Geun-hye regime. But hers has to forget the fact that confronts various issues in the unification polities.
In studies, the Korean peninsula unification needs stances of long endurance and ecumenical communication. In fact, since the Korean peninsula unification policies and philosophy is abstract and ideal, concrete contents attach in it, but a long endurance and ecumenical communication will look to ‘the Korean peninsula trust(credit) process’ in along term. A premise of everything is a communication. Therefore, it is that needs to develop communications of various method. It needs that are not only strategical communication but brotherly affectional communication.
But the problems’ solution is not to be endeavor of south Korea. It is that must endeavor both South Korea and North Korea. But if a endeavor of south Korea has govern the problems’ solutions, does it come across as presumptuous? In a viewpoint of Jesus’ serving, a serving means to happily undergo inconvenience and to lay down pride. In that case, in a stance of christian ethics it is right that endeavors more the south Korea than the north Korea. If unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime are like trust(credit) as accumulating process, it is right that endeavors and yields the south Korea more than the north Korea. This attitudes will be roll a key that solves difficult problems of the Korean peninsula unification.
However it is that is more important idea than this proposal. It is the fact that the faith that possibility of the Korean peninsula unification is always is in our faith. Therefore, through trust(credit)-accumulation through various communications and accumulating trust(credit) through accumulated communications, a public theology suggests the faith that the Korean peninsula unification advances.
For this, it worked to compare and analyze the unification polities of other regimes, and through this work, looked carefully a realistic appropriateness and theological compatibility. And lastly, in a stance of christian ethics, this article suggested theological in a view of public theology for a development of ‘the Korean peninsula trust(credit) process’ of Park Geun-hye regime.
KW - unification policies;the Korean peninsula trust(credit) process;public theology;ecumenical communication;serving
DO -
UR -
ER -
이동춘. (2013). A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime. The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics, 26, 7-54.
이동춘. 2013, "A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime", The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics, no.26, pp.7-54.
이동춘 "A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime" The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics 26 pp.7-54 (2013) : 7.
이동춘. A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime. 2013; 26 : 7-54.
이동춘. "A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime" The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics no.26(2013) : 7-54.
이동춘. A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime. The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics, 26, 7-54.
이동춘. A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime. The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics. 2013; 26 7-54.
이동춘. A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime. 2013; 26 : 7-54.
이동춘. "A christian ethical criticism on the Korean peninsula unification policies of Park Geun-hye regime" The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics no.26(2013) : 7-54.