본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Illusion of “Jokes that Cross the Line” - Comparing High-Contextual Humor in Male Homosociality and Minority Groups

  • Journal of Popular Narrative
  • 2026, 32(2), pp.159~205
  • DOI : 10.18856/jpn.2026.32.2.005
  • Publisher : The Association of Popular Narrative
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Interdisciplinary Research
  • Received : May 7, 2026
  • Accepted : June 18, 2026
  • Published : June 30, 2026

Kim, Si-Yeon 1

1연세대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study examines the political dimensions of humor as a gendered practice, critically analyzing the fictitious construction of "masculine" humor discourse—commonly celebrated as edgy, boundary-pushing comedy. Historically, humor has functioned as the exclusive domain of male homosocial bonding and as a cultural resource for reproducing social hierarchy. Drawing on the anthropological concept of "high-context communication," this paper investigates the divergent ways in which male-centered humor and minority community humor each mobilize contextual meaning. Chapter 2 analyzes sexual and aggressive humor deployed within male homosocial settings. While such humor is often self-styled as transgressive taboo-breaking, its actual mechanisms remain safely contained within dominant norms and normative assumptions. High-contextuality here functions as little more than a rhetorical pose: by evading the risk of exposing the speaker's identity or political position, this humor operates not as genuine transgression but as a "safe provocation"—reaffirming normative authority while displaying social power. Chapter 3 explores the humor of minority communities—including women, queer individuals, and people with disabilities—alongside the recently emergent form of stand-up comedy. In minority humor, high-contextuality is not confined to the rhetorical level; it mediates a genuinely dangerous pleasure that traverses cultural codes, normative boundaries, and identities. Humor thus functions as a political text that directly unsettles the social norms it is presumed merely to flirt with. This study represents a preliminary attempt to rethink the meanings and effects of humor as a social speech act in a more multidimensional way. Whether humor carrying diverse cultural codes can be received and understood is deeply tied to the cultural literacy of a given society. This is precisely why humor demands analysis across multiple registers: its narrative structures and historical genealogies, its sites of performance and communities of reception, and the cultural premises upon which it is grounded.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.