본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Earth’s burden: Science and myths behind Anthropocene debates

  • 탈경계인문학Trans-Humanities
  • 2022, 15(1), pp.79-106
  • DOI : 10.22901/trans.2022.15.1.79
  • Publisher : Ewha Institute for the Humanities: EIH
  • Research Area : Humanities > Other Humanities
  • Received : March 14, 2022
  • Accepted : April 23, 2022
  • Published : April 30, 2022

Ji-hyung Park 1

1이화여자대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Recent debates on the Anthropocene have provided opportunities to recognize humans as geological agents, yet leaving large disagreements on the historical context and political implications of the Anthropocene. Using Kipling’s imperialism as a leitmotiv, this cross-disciplinary review aims to crisscross a broad spectrum of discourses on the demarcation, spatiotemporal backgrounds, and political implications of the Anthropocene. Geologists search for the periods when stratigraphic records such as radioactive isotopes derived from nuclear bomb tests concur with attributable human activities, without offering a clear understanding of the historical force and development of those human activities. The American west travelled by Kipling provides a venue for the transformations from the ‘White Man’s burden’ as God’s calling to the ‘Civilization’s burden’ expropriating the nature and humans as tools for capital accumulation to the ‘Earth’s burden’ threatening the biosphere sustainability. Crisscrossing across the time and space of the Anthropocene suggests that recognizing the Earth as commons, not commodities, combined with political actions required for relieving ‘ecological debts’, would facilitate imagining the ‘Post-Anthropocene’.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.