Health Communication Research 2024 KCI Impact Factor : 0.73
-
pISSN : 2093-2707 / eISSN : 2671-5856
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/hcr
KJCKorea
Journal Central
Interviewing Neuroscientists: Unveiling Challenges in Public Engagement for Neuroscience in Science Communication
- Health Communication Research
- 2024, 23(2), pp.61~106
- DOI : 10.24172/hcr.2024.23.2.61
- Publisher : Korea Health Communication Association
- Research Area : Social Science > Journalism and Broadcasting > Communication
- Received : May 19, 2024
- Accepted : July 10, 2024
- Published : July 31, 2024
Soojin Kim 1, Juhee Eom 2, Young-Joon Ryu 3
1이화여자대학교 커뮤니케이션․미디어연구소
2건국대학교
3강원대학교 의과대학 의료인문학교실
Accredited
ABSTRACT
In an era of rapid scientific and technological advancement, public engagement in risk and science communication has become increasingly crucial. This study delves into the multifaceted concept of public engagement, exploring its significance in forging social consensus and agreement. Through online interviews with a focus group of 10 neuroscientists, a field at the forefront of scientific communication, the study examines the various dimensions of communication challenges faced by neuroscientists. Further, we sought to find out about the current state of science communication in Korea as perceived by neuroscientists. Additionally, the study explores the methodological discussions necessary for engaging the public prior to the societal application of brain-based technologies. The findings reveal internal conflicts among neuroscientists regarding the legitimacy of research methods and the scientific basis of research results. They also highlight the polarization between patient treatment and researcher-driven research. Moreover, neuroscientists expressed concerns about the potential misuse of research results in social applications, emphasizing the need to consider both the positive and negative aspects of scientific breakthroughs. The study concludes by advocating for collaborative efforts between scientists, humanities scholars, social scientists, lawyers, and other experts to foster public interest and participation in the social application of new technologies. This exploratory study contributes to a comprehensive understanding of public engagement from the integrated perspective of risk and science communication.
Statistics
-
512 Viewed
-
1,488 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.
[book]
김동광
/ 2021
/ 마음을 마음대로 조절할 수 있을까
/ 이상북스
: 203~239
[journal]
김동규
/ 2000
/ 사회갈등 보도의 새로운 방향 찾기
/ 한국언론학보
45(1)
: 5~32
[journal]
김수진
/ 2019
/
The Effects of Cultural Bias on Climate Change Policy Compliance and Support Mediating Effects of Risk Perception, Emotion, and Efficacy
/ 한국언론학보
63(4)
: 230~274
[journal]
김소영
/ 2019
/
The Politicization of Science The Main and Interaction Effects of Frame, Inoculation, and Emotion on Message Evaluation, Emotional Attitude and Policy Support
/ 한국언론학보
63(6)
: 65~95
[book]
김영욱
/ 2008
/ 위험 위기 그리고 커뮤니케이션
/ 이화여대 출판부
[journal]
김학수
/ 1999
/ 공공과학과 과학커뮤니케이션과정 연구
/ 한국언론학보
43(4)
: 79~110
[journal]
김학수
/ 2011
/
Comparing Communication Models (PUS vs. PEP/IS) for Radiation Science: An Experimental Study
/ 한국언론학보
55(4)
: 215~232
[book]
류영준
/ 2021
/ 마음을 마음대로 조절할 수 있을까
/ 이상북스
[book]
류영준
/ 2021
/ 신경과학과 신경윤리 : 융합을 위한 현황조사 및 대응기반 보고서
/ 연두출판사
[book]
송해룡
/ 2005
/ 위험커뮤니케이션과 위험수용
/ 커뮤니케이션북스
[journal]
신희건
/ 2020
/ 신경향상 기술이 제기하는 난제-신경법학의 기반 연구를 위한 윤리적 쟁점 검토-
/ 미래의료인문사회과학
3(1)
: 39~61
[journal]
엄주희
/ 2018
/ 뇌신경윤리에 관한 법제 연구
/ 법제
2018(12)
: 44~73
[journal]
엄주희
/ 2022
/
Formation of New Human Rights in Digital and Bio Convergence Technology
/ 헌법학연구
28(4)
: 307~366
[journal]
엄주희
/ 2021
/
The Constitutional Review of Human enhancement : Human enhancement of Military Purpose and Basic Rights
/ 동아법학
(91)
: 27~64
[journal]
이세민
/ 2012
/
A Co-orientation Study on Perceptions towards Science Communication: The Comparison between Experts and the General Public about Nuclear Risk Communication
/ 한국언론학보
56(1)
: 31~57
[report]
정지범
/ 2009
/ 한국인의 사회위험 지각과 정책적 함의
: 1~300
[web]
통계청
/ 2023
/ 2023 고령자 통계2023 고령자 통계 | 전체 | 보도자료 | 새소식
/ 통계청
/ kostat.go.kr
[book]
Akin, H.
/ 2017
/ The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication
: 25~33
[journal]
Andersen, I. E.
/ 2001
/ Scenario workshops and urban planning in Denmark
/ PLA notes
40
: 53~56
[book]
Babbie, E. R.
/ 2020
/ The practice of social research
/ Cengage AU
[journal]
Bauer, M. W.
/ 2007
/ What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda
/ Public Understanding of Science
16(1)
: 79~95
[journal]
Bickerstaff, K.
/ 2001
/ Public understandings of air pollution : the ‘localisation’ of environmental risk
/ Global Environmental Change
11(2)
: 133~145
[journal]
Bolsen, T.
/ 2015
/ Counteracting the politicization of science
/ Journal of Communication
65(5)
: 745~769
[journal]
Bolsen, T.
/ 2018
/ Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change?
/ Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
21(3)
: 389~402
[journal]
Breakwell, G. M.
/ 2000
/ Risk communication : fators affecting impact
/ British Medical Bulletin
56(1)
: 110~120
[journal]
Bubela, T.
/ 2009
/ Science communication reconsidered
/ Nature Biotechnology
27(6)
: 514~518
[journal]
Burns, T. W.
/ 2003
/ Science communication : a contemporary definition
/ Public Understanding of Science
12(2)
: 183~202
[book]
Campbell, V.
/ 2006
/ Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice
/ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
: 205~220
[journal]
Chen, Y.
/ 2022
/ How does Confucian culture affect technological innovation? Evidence from family enterprises in China
/ Plos One
17(6)
: e0269220~
[journal]
Chin, T.
/ 2022
/ Understanding cognitive differences across cultures : Integrating neuroscience and cultural psychology
/ Frontiers in Psychology
13
: 1041734~
[book]
Covello, V. T.
/ 2021
/ Communicating in risk, crisis, and high stress situations: evidence-based strategies and practice
/ John Wiley & Sons
[book]
Covello, V. T.
/ 1988
/ Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis, vol 3
/ Springer
[journal]
Drew, L.
/ 2024
/ Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain chip: what scientists think of first human trial
/ Nature
[journal]
Drew, L.
/ 2024
/ Neuralink brain chip : advance sparks safety and secrecy concerns
/ Nature
627(8002)
: 19~19
[book]
Druckman, J. N.
/ 2017
/ The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication
: 243~252
[journal]
Fishkin, J. S.
/ 2003
/ Consulting the public through deliberative polling
/ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
22(1)
: 128~133
[journal]
Fishkin, J. S.
/ 2000
/ Deliberative polling and public consultation
/ Parliamentary Affairs
53(4)
: 657~666
[book]
Friedman, S.
/ 1986
/ Scientists and journalists. Reporting science as news
/ American Association for the Advancement of Science
[book]
Friedman, V. J.
/ 2008
/ Handbook of action research: The concise paperback edition
: 131~143
[book]
Gastil, J.
/ 2017
/ The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication
/ Oxford University Press
: 233~242
[book]
Gastil, J.
/ 2005
/ The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century
/ Jossey-Bass
[journal]
Gilbert, F.
/ 2011
/ Deep brain stimulation in the media : over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates
/ Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
5
: 16~
[journal]
Glasziou, P.
/ 2008
/ When should a new test become the current reference standard?
/ Annals of Internal Medicine
149(11)
: 816~821
[journal]
Greely, H. T.
/ 2004
/ Disabilities, Enhancements, and the Meanings of Sports
/ Stanford Law and Policy Review
15
: 99~
[report]
House of Lords
/ 2000
/ Science and Technology-Third Report
/ Science and Technology Committee
[journal]
Hörning, G.
/ 1999
/ Citizens’ panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment
/ Science and Public Policy
26(5)
: 351~359
[journal]
Illes, J.
/ 2010
/ Neurotalk : improving the communication of neuroscience research
/ Nature Reviews Neuroscience
11(1)
: 61~69
[book]
Illes, J.
/ 2006
/ Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy
: 149~168
[book]
Irwin, A.
/ 2008
/ The handbook of science and technology studies
: 583~
[journal]
Jensen, E.
/ 2014
/ Why people attend science festivals : Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research
/ Public Understanding of Science
23(5)
: 557~573
[journal]
Jwa, A. S.
/ 2023
/
An XYZ-axis Matrix Approach for the Integration of Neuroscience and Neuroethics
/ Experimental Neurobiology
32(1)
: 8~
[journal]
Kappel, K.
/ 2019
/ Why science communication, and does it work? A taxonomy of science communication aims and a survey of the empirical evidence
/ Frontiers in Communication
4
: 55~
[journal]
Khan, S.
/ 2019
/ Transcending the brain: is there a cost to hacking the nervous system?
/ Brain Communications
1(1)
: fcz015~
[journal]
Kimmerle, J.
/ 2015
/ How laypeople understand the tentativeness of medical research news in the media : An experimental study on the perception of information about deep brain stimulation
/ Science Communication
37(2)
: 173~189
[journal]
Koh, E. J.
/ 2016
/ Mapping neuroscientists’ perceptions of the nature and effects of public visibility
/ Science Communication
38(2)
: 170~196
[journal]
Kouper, I.
/ 2010
/ Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges, and opportunities
/ Journal of Science Communication
9(1)
: A02~
[journal]
Levy, M.
/ 2015
/ The ethics of placebo controlled clinical trials in NMO-A balance of risks
/ Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
4(6)
: 512~514
[journal]
Martin, S.
/ 2000
/ Public participation and citizen-centred local government : Lessons from the best value and better government for older people pilot programmes
/ Public Money & Management
20(2)
: 47~54
[journal]
McCabe, D. P.
/ 2008
/ Seeing is believing : The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning
/ Cognition
107(1)
: 343~352
[journal]
Miller, J. D.
/ 2012
/ What colleges and universities need to do to advance civic scientific literacy and preserve American democracy
/ Liberal Education
98(4)
: 28~33
[web]
Mitchell, A.
/ 2016
/ The Modern News Consumer. Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project
/ https://www.journalism.org/2016/07/07/the-modern-news-consumer/
[book]
Moser, S. C.
/ 2007
/ Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change
/ Cambridge University Press
[book]
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
/ 2017
/ Communicating Science Effectively : A Research Agenda
/ The National Academies Press
[other]
/ Neuralink (@neuralink) / X
[journal]
Nisbet, M. C.
/ 2009
/ Communicating climate change : Why frames matter for public engagement
/ Environment : Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
51(2)
: 12~23
[journal]
O’Connor, C.
/ 2014
/ Social representations of brain research : Exploring public(dis)engagement with contemporary neuroscience
/ Science Communication
36(5)
: 617~645
[journal]
Owens, S.
/ 2000
/ ‘Engaging the public’ : information and deliberation in environmental policy
/ Environment and Planning A
32(7)
: 1141~1148
[journal]
Peters, H. P.
/ 2008
/ Science-media interface : It’s time to reconsider
/ Science Communication
30(2)
: 266~276
[journal]
Racine, E.
/ 2007
/ "Currents of hope" : neurostimulation techniques in US and UK print media
/ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
16(3)
: 312~316
[journal]
Racine, E.
/ 2010
/ Contemporary neuroscience in the media
/ Social Science & Medicine
71(4)
: 725~733
[journal]
Renn, O.
/ 1998
/ Three decades of risk research : accomplishments and new challenges
/ Journal of Risk Research
1(1)
: 49~71
[journal]
Rowe, G.
/ 2000
/ Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation
/ Science, Technology, & Human Values
25(1)
: 3~29
[book]
Russell, N.
/ 2009
/ Communicating science: Professional, popular, literary
/ Cambridge University Press
[journal]
del Carmen Sánchez-Mora, M.
/ 2016
/ Towards a taxonomy for public communication of science activities
/ Journal of Science Communication
15(02)
: Y01_en-1~
[journal]
Scheufele, D. A.
/ 2014
/ Science communication as political communication
/ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
111(supplement_4)
: 13585~13592
[journal]
Schwitzer, G.
/ 2008
/ How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? An evaluation of 500 stories
/ PLoS Medicine
5(5)
: e95~
[journal]
Smith, G.
/ 1999
/ The theory and practice of citizens’ juries
/ Policy & Politics
27(3)
: 295~308
[web]
/ 1985
/ The Royal Society
/ https://royalsociety.org/~/media/royal_society_content/policy/publications/1985/10700.pdf
[book]
Trench, B.
/ 2008
/ Communicating science in social contexts: New models, new practices
: 119~135
[journal]
Wachelder, J.
/ 2003
/ Democratizing science: various routes and visions of Dutch science shops
/ Science, Technology, & Human Values
28(2)
: 244~273
[journal]
Weingart, P.
/ 2021
/ Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy
/ PloS one
16(7)
: e0254201~
[book]
Wimmer, R. D.
/ 2013
/ Mass media research
/ Cengage learning
[journal]
Yu, F.
/ 2022
/ Understanding East-West Cultural Differences on Perceived Compensation Fairness Among Executives : From a Neuroscience Perspective
/ Frontiers in Psychology
12
: 815641~
This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.