[book]
김동광
/ 2021
/ 마음을 마음대로 조절할 수 있을까
/ 이상북스
: 203~239
[journal]
김동규
/ 2000
/ 사회갈등 보도의 새로운 방향 찾기
/ 한국언론학보
45(1)
: 5~32
[book]
김영욱
/ 2008
/ 위험 위기 그리고 커뮤니케이션
/ 이화여대 출판부
[journal]
김학수
/ 1999
/ 공공과학과 과학커뮤니케이션과정 연구
/ 한국언론학보
43(4)
: 79~110
[book]
류영준
/ 2021
/ 마음을 마음대로 조절할 수 있을까
/ 이상북스
[book]
류영준
/ 2021
/ 신경과학과 신경윤리 : 융합을 위한 현황조사 및 대응기반 보고서
/ 연두출판사
[book]
송해룡
/ 2005
/ 위험커뮤니케이션과 위험수용
/ 커뮤니케이션북스
[journal]
신희건
/ 2020
/ 신경향상 기술이 제기하는 난제-신경법학의 기반 연구를 위한 윤리적 쟁점 검토-
/ 미래의료인문사회과학
3(1)
: 39~61
[journal]
엄주희
/ 2018
/ 뇌신경윤리에 관한 법제 연구
/ 법제
2018(12)
: 44~73
[report]
정지범
/ 2009
/ 한국인의 사회위험 지각과 정책적 함의
: 1~300
[web]
통계청
/ 2023
/ 2023 고령자 통계2023 고령자 통계 | 전체 | 보도자료 | 새소식
/ 통계청
/
kostat.go.kr
[book]
Akin, H.
/ 2017
/ The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication
: 25~33
[journal]
Andersen, I. E.
/ 2001
/ Scenario workshops and urban planning in Denmark
/ PLA notes
40
: 53~56
[book]
Babbie, E. R.
/ 2020
/ The practice of social research
/ Cengage AU
[journal]
Bauer, M. W.
/ 2007
/ What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda
/ Public Understanding of Science
16(1)
: 79~95
[journal]
Bickerstaff, K.
/ 2001
/ Public understandings of air pollution : the ‘localisation’ of environmental risk
/ Global Environmental Change
11(2)
: 133~145
[journal]
Bolsen, T.
/ 2015
/ Counteracting the politicization of science
/ Journal of Communication
65(5)
: 745~769
[journal]
Bolsen, T.
/ 2018
/ Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change?
/ Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
21(3)
: 389~402
[journal]
Breakwell, G. M.
/ 2000
/ Risk communication : fators affecting impact
/ British Medical Bulletin
56(1)
: 110~120
[journal]
Bubela, T.
/ 2009
/ Science communication reconsidered
/ Nature Biotechnology
27(6)
: 514~518
[journal]
Burns, T. W.
/ 2003
/ Science communication : a contemporary definition
/ Public Understanding of Science
12(2)
: 183~202
[book]
Campbell, V.
/ 2006
/ Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice
/ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
: 205~220
[journal]
Chen, Y.
/ 2022
/ How does Confucian culture affect technological innovation? Evidence from family enterprises in China
/ Plos One
17(6)
: e0269220~
[journal]
Chin, T.
/ 2022
/ Understanding cognitive differences across cultures : Integrating neuroscience and cultural psychology
/ Frontiers in Psychology
13
: 1041734~
[book]
Covello, V. T.
/ 2021
/ Communicating in risk, crisis, and high stress situations: evidence-based strategies and practice
/ John Wiley & Sons
[book]
Covello, V. T.
/ 1988
/ Carcinogen Risk Assessment. Contemporary Issues in Risk Analysis, vol 3
/ Springer
[journal]
Drew, L.
/ 2024
/ Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain chip: what scientists think of first human trial
/ Nature
[journal]
Drew, L.
/ 2024
/ Neuralink brain chip : advance sparks safety and secrecy concerns
/ Nature
627(8002)
: 19~19
[book]
Druckman, J. N.
/ 2017
/ The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication
: 243~252
[journal]
Fishkin, J. S.
/ 2003
/ Consulting the public through deliberative polling
/ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
22(1)
: 128~133
[journal]
Fishkin, J. S.
/ 2000
/ Deliberative polling and public consultation
/ Parliamentary Affairs
53(4)
: 657~666
[book]
Friedman, S.
/ 1986
/ Scientists and journalists. Reporting science as news
/ American Association for the Advancement of Science
[book]
Friedman, V. J.
/ 2008
/ Handbook of action research: The concise paperback edition
: 131~143
[book]
Gastil, J.
/ 2017
/ The Oxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication
/ Oxford University Press
: 233~242
[book]
Gastil, J.
/ 2005
/ The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century
/ Jossey-Bass
[journal]
Gilbert, F.
/ 2011
/ Deep brain stimulation in the media : over-optimistic portrayals call for a new strategy involving journalists and scientists in ethical debates
/ Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
5
: 16~
[journal]
Glasziou, P.
/ 2008
/ When should a new test become the current reference standard?
/ Annals of Internal Medicine
149(11)
: 816~821
[journal]
Greely, H. T.
/ 2004
/ Disabilities, Enhancements, and the Meanings of Sports
/ Stanford Law and Policy Review
15
: 99~
[report]
House of Lords
/ 2000
/ Science and Technology-Third Report
/ Science and Technology Committee
[journal]
Hörning, G.
/ 1999
/ Citizens’ panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment
/ Science and Public Policy
26(5)
: 351~359
[journal]
Illes, J.
/ 2010
/ Neurotalk : improving the communication of neuroscience research
/ Nature Reviews Neuroscience
11(1)
: 61~69
[book]
Illes, J.
/ 2006
/ Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy
: 149~168
[book]
Irwin, A.
/ 2008
/ The handbook of science and technology studies
: 583~
[journal]
Jensen, E.
/ 2014
/ Why people attend science festivals : Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research
/ Public Understanding of Science
23(5)
: 557~573
[journal]
Kappel, K.
/ 2019
/ Why science communication, and does it work? A taxonomy of science communication aims and a survey of the empirical evidence
/ Frontiers in Communication
4
: 55~
[journal]
Khan, S.
/ 2019
/ Transcending the brain: is there a cost to hacking the nervous system?
/ Brain Communications
1(1)
: fcz015~
[journal]
Kimmerle, J.
/ 2015
/ How laypeople understand the tentativeness of medical research news in the media : An experimental study on the perception of information about deep brain stimulation
/ Science Communication
37(2)
: 173~189
[journal]
Koh, E. J.
/ 2016
/ Mapping neuroscientists’ perceptions of the nature and effects of public visibility
/ Science Communication
38(2)
: 170~196
[journal]
Kouper, I.
/ 2010
/ Science blogs and public engagement with science: Practices, challenges, and opportunities
/ Journal of Science Communication
9(1)
: A02~
[journal]
Levy, M.
/ 2015
/ The ethics of placebo controlled clinical trials in NMO-A balance of risks
/ Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
4(6)
: 512~514
[journal]
Martin, S.
/ 2000
/ Public participation and citizen-centred local government : Lessons from the best value and better government for older people pilot programmes
/ Public Money & Management
20(2)
: 47~54
[journal]
McCabe, D. P.
/ 2008
/ Seeing is believing : The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning
/ Cognition
107(1)
: 343~352
[journal]
Miller, J. D.
/ 2012
/ What colleges and universities need to do to advance civic scientific literacy and preserve American democracy
/ Liberal Education
98(4)
: 28~33
[book]
Moser, S. C.
/ 2007
/ Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change
/ Cambridge University Press
[book]
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
/ 2017
/ Communicating Science Effectively : A Research Agenda
/ The National Academies Press
[other]
/ Neuralink (@neuralink) / X
[journal]
Nisbet, M. C.
/ 2009
/ Communicating climate change : Why frames matter for public engagement
/ Environment : Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
51(2)
: 12~23
[journal]
O’Connor, C.
/ 2014
/ Social representations of brain research : Exploring public(dis)engagement with contemporary neuroscience
/ Science Communication
36(5)
: 617~645
[journal]
Owens, S.
/ 2000
/ ‘Engaging the public’ : information and deliberation in environmental policy
/ Environment and Planning A
32(7)
: 1141~1148
[journal]
Peters, H. P.
/ 2008
/ Science-media interface : It’s time to reconsider
/ Science Communication
30(2)
: 266~276
[journal]
Racine, E.
/ 2007
/ "Currents of hope" : neurostimulation techniques in US and UK print media
/ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
16(3)
: 312~316
[journal]
Racine, E.
/ 2010
/ Contemporary neuroscience in the media
/ Social Science & Medicine
71(4)
: 725~733
[journal]
Renn, O.
/ 1998
/ Three decades of risk research : accomplishments and new challenges
/ Journal of Risk Research
1(1)
: 49~71
[journal]
Rowe, G.
/ 2000
/ Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation
/ Science, Technology, & Human Values
25(1)
: 3~29
[book]
Russell, N.
/ 2009
/ Communicating science: Professional, popular, literary
/ Cambridge University Press
[journal]
del Carmen Sánchez-Mora, M.
/ 2016
/ Towards a taxonomy for public communication of science activities
/ Journal of Science Communication
15(02)
: Y01_en-1~
[journal]
Scheufele, D. A.
/ 2014
/ Science communication as political communication
/ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
111(supplement_4)
: 13585~13592
[journal]
Schwitzer, G.
/ 2008
/ How do US journalists cover treatments, tests, products, and procedures? An evaluation of 500 stories
/ PLoS Medicine
5(5)
: e95~
[journal]
Smith, G.
/ 1999
/ The theory and practice of citizens’ juries
/ Policy & Politics
27(3)
: 295~308
[book]
Trench, B.
/ 2008
/ Communicating science in social contexts: New models, new practices
: 119~135
[journal]
Wachelder, J.
/ 2003
/ Democratizing science: various routes and visions of Dutch science shops
/ Science, Technology, & Human Values
28(2)
: 244~273
[journal]
Weingart, P.
/ 2021
/ Public engagement with science—Origins, motives and impact in academic literature and science policy
/ PloS one
16(7)
: e0254201~
[book]
Wimmer, R. D.
/ 2013
/ Mass media research
/ Cengage learning
[journal]
Yu, F.
/ 2022
/ Understanding East-West Cultural Differences on Perceived Compensation Fairness Among Executives : From a Neuroscience Perspective
/ Frontiers in Psychology
12
: 815641~