KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002412771},
author={lee giwon},
title={The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －},
journal={Journal of Humanities},
issn={1598-8457},
year={2018},
number={71},
pages={305-336},
doi={10.31310/HUM.071.10}

TY - JOUR
AU - lee giwon
TI - The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －
JO - Journal of Humanities
PY - 2018
VL - null
IS - 71
PB - Institute for Humanities
SP - 305
EP - 336
SN - 1598-8457
AB - This paper has made a comparative analysis of the idea of proprieties of Jeong Yak-Yong and those of Sorai and Shundai from the perspective of the theory of mind cultivation. In terms of the understanding of proprieties, Jeong Yak-Yong, Sorai, and Shundai have similar, but different aspects to each other. Jeong Yak-Yong mentions the issue of heartburn, by emphasizing the importance of mind control based on proprieties. He says that the Song Confucian scholars’ theory of mind cultivation eventually causes the ‘heartburn’, which is supported by Sorai and Shundai. Nevertheless, Jeong Yak-Yong, Sorai, and Shundai show differences with regard to the methods of overcoming the ‘heartburn’. Jeong Yak-Yong shows a strong belief in mind while Sorai and Shundai do not trust mind because Sorai and Shundai deny the universality of mind. In accordance with the matter of acknowledging the universality of mind for the mind control with proprieties, Jeong Yak-Yong, Sorai, and Shundai stand in a position different to each other. In the aspect of the theory of mind cultivation, Jeong Yak-Yong, Sorai, and Shundai show a considerable distance from each other. The expansion of this philosophical distance could be led to the differences in the study of Confucianism in the Joseon dynasty and Japan. In order to more closely examine these differences, a comparative approach to the respective Confucian scholars would be an important task.
KW - Jeong;Yak-Yong;Ogyu Sorai;dazai Sundai;the theory of mind cultivation;The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners
DO - 10.31310/HUM.071.10
ER -

lee giwon. (2018). The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －. Journal of Humanities, 71, 305-336.

lee giwon. 2018, "The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －", Journal of Humanities, no.71, pp.305-336. Available from: doi:10.31310/HUM.071.10

lee giwon "The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －" Journal of Humanities 71 pp.305-336 (2018) : 305.

lee giwon. The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －. 2018; 71 : 305-336. Available from: doi:10.31310/HUM.071.10

lee giwon. "The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －" Journal of Humanities no.71(2018) : 305-336.doi: 10.31310/HUM.071.10

lee giwon. The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －. Journal of Humanities, 71, 305-336. doi: 10.31310/HUM.071.10

lee giwon. The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －. Journal of Humanities. 2018; 71 305-336. doi: 10.31310/HUM.071.10

lee giwon. The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －. 2018; 71 : 305-336. Available from: doi:10.31310/HUM.071.10

lee giwon. "The Theory of Mind Cultivation by Jeong Yak-Yong － The Conflicts over the Methods of Controlling Mind with Manners by the Sorai School －" Journal of Humanities no.71(2018) : 305-336.doi: 10.31310/HUM.071.10