@article{ART001466353},
author={Saodat Boimirzaeva},
title={Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts},
journal={PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE},
issn={1975-1621},
year={2010},
number={10},
pages={165-172}
TY - JOUR
AU - Saodat Boimirzaeva
TI - Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts
JO - PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE
PY - 2010
VL - null
IS - 10
PB - Research Institute for East-West Thought
SP - 165
EP - 172
SN - 1975-1621
AB - The article deals with perception and understanding of the semantic text. A starting point of analysis is activity of the reader. Systemic parameters of the text are analyzed. Structural and penetrational types of reading are characterized.Present-day studies of the text usually regard it аs a self-organized system. Among inherent systemic features of the text its non-summative meaning is mentioned the oftenest. Let us try to explain why its meaning exceeds the mere sum of meanings of its constituents.
KW - super structure;super frame;sub frame;perlocutionary effect;anaphoric expression;cataphoric expression;focus;coherence;the NEW
DO -
UR -
ER -
Saodat Boimirzaeva. (2010). Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts. PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, 10, 165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. 2010, "Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts", PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, no.10, pp.165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva "Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts" PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE 10 pp.165-172 (2010) : 165.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts. 2010; 10 : 165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. "Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts" PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE no.10(2010) : 165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts. PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, 10, 165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts. PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE. 2010; 10 165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts. 2010; 10 : 165-172.
Saodat Boimirzaeva. "Reading and Understanding of Scientific Texts" PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE no.10(2010) : 165-172.
