본문 바로가기
  • Home

From Psychoanalysis to Daseinsanalysis

  • PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE
  • 2019, (29), pp.70~92
  • DOI : 10.33639/ptc.2019..29.004
  • Publisher : Research Institute for East-West Thought
  • Research Area : Humanities > Other Humanities
  • Received : December 20, 2018
  • Accepted : January 30, 2019
  • Published : January 31, 2019

Woo Jungmin 1

1경북대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy on the development of the Daseinsanalysis based on his critique of Freud’s psychoanalysis. Freud criticized the fact that contemporary psychiatry did not have an independent system of scholarship, and tried to establish a new psychiatric foundation through his psychoanalysis. However, according to Heidegger’s critique, Freud did not fully grasp the mental phenomenon of man because he maintained the naturalistic attitude that he tried to overcome. Boss who had followed the method of psychoanalysis also criticized Freud. Furthermore, while accepting Heidegger’s Daseinsanalytik, Boss developed Daseinsanalysis which is his unique methodology applicable to the clinical situations. But the criticism of Freud in psychoanalysis and Daseinsanalysis is characteristic not only of following Heidegger’s point of view but also of directly using Heidegger’s philosophical terms. A comparison of Heidegger’s and Bose’s criticisms of Freud reveals the reason why Daseinsanalysis was derived from the criticism of psychoanalysis and Heidegger’s influence on Daseinsanalysis.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.