본문 바로가기
  • Home

Liberalism at the Crossroads

  • PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE
  • 2020, (34), pp.430~457
  • DOI : 10.33639/ptc.2020..34.017
  • Publisher : Research Institute for East-West Thought
  • Research Area : Humanities > Other Humanities
  • Received : October 25, 2020
  • Accepted : November 29, 2020
  • Published : November 30, 2020

Shin Joong Sop 1

1강원대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study defines liberalism as a paradigm, and critically analyzes Patrick Deneen’s Why liberalism Failed. I am trying to propose a civil republicanism as a way to minimize the problems of liberalism. Deneen analyzes the failures of liberalism and does not seek an alternative ideology, arguing that liberalism cannot be modified or supplemented and should be discarded. However, like the paradigm in science, the ideological paradigm is not discarded until a new ideology that can replace it emerges and gains support from people. Thus, liberalism will continue for the time being. In this situation, although civic republicanism pointed out the problem of liberalism and suggested it as an alternative ideology, it has many factors that can complement liberalism. This paper will focus on the civic virtue of civil republicanism, and argue that civil republicanism is compatible with liberalism and can function to solve the problems of liberalism.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.