@article{ART001301556},
author={현지연},
title={The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory},
journal={Journal of History of Modern Art},
issn={1598-7728},
year={2008},
number={24},
pages={59-80},
doi={10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003}
TY - JOUR
AU - 현지연
TI - The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory
JO - Journal of History of Modern Art
PY - 2008
VL - null
IS - 24
PB - 현대미술사학회
SP - 59
EP - 80
SN - 1598-7728
AB - The French philosopher Yves Michaud has asked about the nature of contemporary art and aesthetic experience all along from his first book, “Artist and commissionaires”. He comprehends that the paradigm of the Modernism is not more available for the contemporary art’s situations and observes how the new paradigm of art relates to the work of art and products the new forms of aesthetic experience.
He observes “the double movement between vaporization of art and aestheticization of societies” invading our life in the whole aspects like science, politics, art, architecture, fashion, cooking etc. He describes the process of this ‘double movement’ and its consequences that consist of the new paradigm of art and aesthetic experience in our time.
The position as analytic philosopher adopted by Michaud is more flexible than that of ontology or historicism. Because the ontology is inclined to set something forth as a premise and the historicism to recognize the only one dominant form. For Michaud, one of the most proper means to explain the art might be to observe, analyze and diagnose as exactly as possible the new paradigm of art.
KW - 이브 미쇼(Yves Michaud);기체 상태의 예술( gaseous state of the Art);미학적 기준(aesthetic criterion);미학적 경험(aesthetic experience);미학적 언어 게임(aesthetic language game);예술의 소멸(disappearance of the Art);쾌락주의(hedonism);관관주의(tourism);다윈주의(Darwinism);단토(Arthur Danto);넬슨 굿맨(Nelson Goodman);모든 지식의 대학(University of all knowledge);
DO - 10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
ER -
현지연. (2008). The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory. Journal of History of Modern Art, 24, 59-80.
현지연. 2008, "The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory", Journal of History of Modern Art, no.24, pp.59-80. Available from: doi:10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
현지연 "The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory" Journal of History of Modern Art 24 pp.59-80 (2008) : 59.
현지연. The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory. 2008; 24 : 59-80. Available from: doi:10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
현지연. "The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory" Journal of History of Modern Art no.24(2008) : 59-80.doi: 10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
현지연. The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory. Journal of History of Modern Art, 24, 59-80. doi: 10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
현지연. The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory. Journal of History of Modern Art. 2008; 24 59-80. doi: 10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
현지연. The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory. 2008; 24 : 59-80. Available from: doi:10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003
현지연. "The Generalization and New Paradigm of Aesthetic Experience: Yves Michaud’s Art Theory" Journal of History of Modern Art no.24(2008) : 59-80.doi: 10.17057/kahoma.2008..24.003