Korea Social Policy Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 2.47
-
pISSN : 1226-0525
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/kasp
KJCKorea
Journal Central
Priority Setting and Social Consensus Model in Health Care
- Korea Social Policy Review
- Abbr : KSPR
- 2009, 16(1), pp.1-40
- DOI : 10.17000/kspr.16.1.200907.1
- Publisher : Korean Association of Social Policy
- Research Area : Social Science > Sociology > Medical / Welfare / Social policy
1서강대학교 공공정책대학원
2연세대학교 사회발전연구소
3성균관대학교
Accredited
ABSTRACT
The priority setting based on social consensus related to the financial substantiality and benefits range of the National Health Insurance is social not discussed as before. This Study dealt with a Korean model of the priority setting based on social consensus in health care. Related to the NHI, this study focused on the objects, levels and mechanism of the priority setting in health care as well as the recent international discussions on this theme.
The particular criteria after the principle based on the social consensus can acquire the legitimation for the decision of the expanding benefit catalogue of the NHI. The establishment of the priority setting based on social consensus leads the restructuralization of the present decision-making framework of the NHI for the purpose of the national participation.
Statistics
-
345 Viewed
-
129 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[other]
건강보장 미래전략위원회
/ 2007
/ 건강보장 미래전략
[book]
건강보험발전위원회
/ 2003
/ 건강보험발전을 위한 정책제언
/ 건강보험발전위원회․국민건강보험공단.
[book]
김정희
/ 2006
/ 2005년도 건강보험환자의 본인부담 진료비 실태조사
/ 국민건강보험공단
[thesis]
김주경
/ 2004
/ 건강보험급여확대의 우선순위 선정에 관한 연구
/ 박사
/ 연세대학교
[book]
오영호
/ 2005
/ 의료공급의 중장기 추계
/ 한국보건사회연구원
[book]
서남규
/ 2005
/ 2005년도 국민건강보험제도 국민만족도 조사
/ 국민 건강보험공단.
[book]
서남규
/ 2006
/ 2006년도 국민건강보험제도 국민만족도 조사
/ 국민건강보험공단.
[book]
이상이
/ 2005
/ 적정 의료자원할당을 위한 사회적 합의모델에 관한 연구
/ 국민건강보험공단.
[book]
이상이
/ 2006
/ 사회적 합의에 기반한 의료자원 우선순위에 관한 연구
/ 국민건강보험공단
[book]
이상일
/ 2004
/ 우리나라에서의 진료지침 발전 방안 - 건강보험발전을 위한 논의과제 II
/ 건강보험발전위원회․국민건강보험공단.
[book]
이태수
/ 2004
/ 보험자 역할 재정립 방안 연구
/ 꽃동네현도사회복지대학교․국민건강보험공단.
[journal]
정석국
/ 2003
/ 캐나다 보건의료보장제도의 개혁과 공중의 판단
/ 사회보장연구
23(1)
[book]
정형선
/ 2004
/ 국민건강보험 내실화를 위한 기본급여 영역에 관한 연구
/ 연세대학교․국민건강보험공단.
[other]
메디포스
/ 2009
/ 의료서비스산업 선진화 방안 무엇을 담았나?
/ 메디포스
[book]
Bȁckman K
/ 2004
/ Open Priorities in Ȍstergȍtland
/ The National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care
[report]
Carolyn M. C
/ 2002
/ Setting Priorities:'American Style' The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing
/ Building on Value: the Future of Health Care in Canada - Final Report.
[journal]
Cookson R
/ 2000
/ Principles of justice in health care rationing
/ J. Med, Ethics
226
: 323~329
[book]
Coulter A.
/ 2000
/ The Global Challenge of Health Care Rationing
/ Open University Press.
[journal]
Doran P
/ 1999
/ Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study
/ BMJ
318
: 916~919
[book]
Garpenby, P
/ 2003
/ The Priority setting process - A Macro Perspective
/ The National Centre for Priorit Setting in Health Care(Sweden).
[book]
Gibis B
/ 2004
/ shifting criteria for benefit decisions in social health insurance systems
/ Open University Press.
[journal]
Ham C
/ 1995
/ Health care rationing
/ BMJ
310
: 1483~1484
[book]
Ham C
/ 2003
/ Resonable Rationing
/ McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
[other]
Ham C
/ 2000
/ International Approaches to Priority Setting in Health Care
[book]
Hauck K
/ 2004
/ The Economics of Priority Setting for Health Care: A Literature Review
/ The World Bank.
[journal]
Holm S
/ 1998
/ Goodbye to the simple solutions : The second phase of priority setting in health care
/ BMJ
317
: 1000~1012
[other]
Holm S
/ 2000
/ Developments in The Nordic countries - Goodbye to the Simple Solutions
[journal]
Klein R
/ 1995
/ Priorities and rationing: Pragmatism or principles?
/ BMJ
311
: 761~762
[journal]
Klein R
/ 1998
/ Puzzling out priorities: why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process
/ BMJ
317
: 959~960
[journal]
Lee S.Y
/ 2008
/ The National Health Insurance system as one type of new typology: The case of South Korea and Taiwan
/ Health Policy
85
: 105~113
[other]
Liss PE
/ 2002
/ Fördelning, prioritering och ransonering - en begreppsanalys
[other]
Linköping
/ 2004
/ Prioriterings Centrum. Allocation, priority setting,and rationing - concept analysis
[other]
PrioriteringsCentrum Local Government Ma
/ 1996
/ Involving The Public
[journal]
Mossialos E
/ 1999
/ Citizen and rationing : analysis of a European survey
/ Health Policy
49
: 75~135
[journal]
Mullen PM
/ 2000
/ Public involvement in health care priority settings: an overview of method for eliciting values
/ Health Expections
2
: 222~234
[book]
Roberts MJ
/ 2004
/ Getting Health Reform Right: A Guide to Improving Performance and Equity
/ Oxford University Press.
[book]
National Health Committee
/ 2004
/ Proiritising Health Services
/ A background paper for the National Health Committee
[other]
National Health Committee(New Zealand)
/ 2006
/ District Health Board decision-making about new health intervention
[other]
NICE
/ 2005
/ Social Value Judgements: Guidelines for The Institue and Its Advisory Bodies
[other]
OECD
/ 2006
/ Health Data 2006
[book]
Olsen, J. A
/ 1998
/ Priority Setting in the Public Health Service: Results of an Australian Survey
/ Centre for Health Program Evaluation
[other]
Swedish Parliamentary Priorities Commission
/ 1995
/ Priorities in health care: Ethics, Economy, Implementation(Våardens svåara val)
/ Ministry of Health and Social Affairs
[other]
Swedish Health Care and Medical Priorities Commission
/ 1993
/ No Easy Choices: The Difficult Priorities of Health Care (Våardens svåara val)
/ Ministry of Health and Social Affairs