@article{ART002235741},
author={Nam Kyoung Jo},
title={A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors},
journal={Korea Social Policy Review},
issn={1226-0525},
year={2017},
volume={24},
number={2},
pages={245-275},
doi={10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245}
TY - JOUR
AU - Nam Kyoung Jo
TI - A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors
JO - Korea Social Policy Review
PY - 2017
VL - 24
IS - 2
PB - Korean Association of Social Policy
SP - 245
EP - 275
SN - 1226-0525
AB - It is attempted here to explain change in welfare attitudes for two decades in 10 countries with the cohort effect, especially differences in societal values between generations. It was found that for the last 20 years pro-welfare attitudes of the public has been strengthened, on which the generation has impact, more by the cohort effect than by the age effect, and that the Millennials/Y-generation are the strongest supporters for the state welfare. Value-differences between cohorts, as a background factor for the cohort effect on welfare attitudes, are clear but show a kind of linear trend from the older to the younger cohorts. As for the cohort effect on welfare attitudes, it is expected, at least for the short-term future, in the direction toward supporting the expansion of the state welfare. Korean welfare attitudes show an exceptional pattern - preferring income inequality as incentives, and at the same time, the expansion of governmental welfare responsibility, which echoes recent arguments of contradictoriness and non-class-orientedness of Korean welfare attitudes. Especially, Korean Millennials/Y-G shows this contradictory welfare attitudes the most strongly, which is unique between 10 countries in this study, implying their fierce competition is being internalized. It is expected that the contradictoriness of Korean welfare attitudes may limit its possibility to back up welfare expansion in Korea.
KW - welfare attitudes;generational effect;age effect;cohort effect;values
DO - 10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
ER -
Nam Kyoung Jo. (2017). A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors. Korea Social Policy Review, 24(2), 245-275.
Nam Kyoung Jo. 2017, "A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors", Korea Social Policy Review, vol.24, no.2 pp.245-275. Available from: doi:10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
Nam Kyoung Jo "A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors" Korea Social Policy Review 24.2 pp.245-275 (2017) : 245.
Nam Kyoung Jo. A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors. 2017; 24(2), 245-275. Available from: doi:10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
Nam Kyoung Jo. "A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors" Korea Social Policy Review 24, no.2 (2017) : 245-275.doi: 10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
Nam Kyoung Jo. A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors. Korea Social Policy Review, 24(2), 245-275. doi: 10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
Nam Kyoung Jo. A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors. Korea Social Policy Review. 2017; 24(2) 245-275. doi: 10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
Nam Kyoung Jo. A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors. 2017; 24(2), 245-275. Available from: doi:10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245
Nam Kyoung Jo. "A Study of the Generational Cleavage in Welfare Attitudes: Differentiating Cohort Effect from Age Effect and Finding Its Factors" Korea Social Policy Review 24, no.2 (2017) : 245-275.doi: 10.17000/kspr.24.2.201706.245