In this study, I understand that the double writings of the aspirated
consonants have the same root, but they went through the process of
selecting the writing types consecutively.
This study focused on phonological phenomena, the recognition of
correspondence, and the phonetic features under my assumption that each
phonetic form has three writing forms.
I founded that the ‘ㅅ’ of ‘ㅅ+ㅊ’ in the type(2) was realized [t┓] not only
in the modern Korean but also in the middle age Korean. Moreover, I
founded that ‘ㅈ, ㅊ, auxiliary ㅅ(or sai si-ot)’ were realized [t┓] from 15
century, and I also analyzed that ‘ㅅ+ㅊ’ is composed of two phonetic
values [t┓] and [cˊ]. In contrast, the ‘ㅊ=ㅅ+ㅎ’ type appears at
‘Oryunjeonbieonhae(1721)’.
I understand that the examples such as ‘빗히, 빗히로다, 낫낫히’ are
combined with the subjective particle ‘이’, predicative particle ‘이다’,
adverb derived suffix ‘-이’ respectively and situated in the palatalization
environment at the same time.
【Abstracts】
48
이 논문은 2008년 5월 25일에 투고되었으며, 2008년 7월 8일에 심사 완료
되어 8월 10일에 게재가 확정되었음.
In my view, above three examples were influenced by the
over-correction of the palatalization. On the other hand, I found that the
examples ‘빗, 빗헤, 것흐로, 것, 갓셔, 걷흐로만’ were influenced by
the re-structuralization in relation to the non-phonological reasons.
Therefore, with the above reasons, I assume that ‘ㅅ+ㅎ’, the type(3) of ‘ㅊ’,
is not corresponding to ‘ㅊ’, but ‘ㅌ’.
In short, it would be possible to correct the combined writings by three
types and suggest their phonetic reality as follows;
[표]