@article{ART001649893},
author={Heo Jae-young},
title={A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century},
journal={Korean Language & Literature},
issn={1229-1730},
year={2012},
number={80},
pages={5-28}
TY - JOUR
AU - Heo Jae-young
TI - A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century
JO - Korean Language & Literature
PY - 2012
VL - null
IS - 80
PB - Korean Language & Literature
SP - 5
EP - 28
SN - 1229-1730
AB - This study aims to explain the advanced process of the Korean final ending ‘-SO(-소)’, ‘-O(-오)’, ‘-JI(-지)’ and ‘-A/-EO(-아/-어)’. These morphemes were functioned two or more intention categories. The results as follows.
First, I found the two or more functioned intentional final endings from the Underwood's 1893. But these morphemes was studied by Kwon Jae-il(2005).
Second, the morpheme ‘-SO’ was used to declarative and imperative categories. And the morpheme ‘-O’ was used to declarative, imperative and interrogative intentions. The morpheme of ‘-JI’ was used to declarative and interrogative categories, and ‘-A/-EO’ was declarative and imperative intentions.
Third, I guessed the formation of these grammatical function was related in the pre-final ending ‘-sʌp()-/-ʌp()-’. These morphemes functioned the respected to objects. But these morphemes weakened in the 19th century. So the ‘-SO’, ‘-ʌp-SO’ and ‘-O’ were neutralized the same degree.
Fourth, ‘-JI’ was formed by the grammaticalization of the bound noun ‘dʌ()’. The morpheme ‘-JIO’ was ‘-JI-IO’, but the postpositional word ‘YO(요)’ formed in this time. As a results, the omitted form ‘-JI’ was functioned two or more intentional categories.
Fifth, I guessed the formed of ‘-A/-EO’ was similar to other morphemes's functional change.
KW - two or more functioned intentional final endings;intention categories;grammatical function;grammaticalization
DO -
UR -
ER -
Heo Jae-young. (2012). A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century. Korean Language & Literature, 80, 5-28.
Heo Jae-young. 2012, "A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century", Korean Language & Literature, no.80, pp.5-28.
Heo Jae-young "A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century" Korean Language & Literature 80 pp.5-28 (2012) : 5.
Heo Jae-young. A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century. 2012; 80 : 5-28.
Heo Jae-young. "A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century" Korean Language & Literature no.80(2012) : 5-28.
Heo Jae-young. A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century. Korean Language & Literature, 80, 5-28.
Heo Jae-young. A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century. Korean Language & Literature. 2012; 80 5-28.
Heo Jae-young. A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century. 2012; 80 : 5-28.
Heo Jae-young. "A Study on the Development of the Two o rMore Functional Finial Endings during the Last Part of the 19th Century" Korean Language & Literature no.80(2012) : 5-28.
