본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Discoursing Meaning for Kim Soo Yeong's Criticism of Poetry -Focused on Discussion for Participation Poetry-

  • Korean Language & Literature
  • 2012, (82), pp.349-368
  • Publisher : Korean Language & Literature
  • Research Area : Humanities > Korean Language and Literature

Kim Dong Geun 1

1전남대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

Kim Soo Yeong occupies leading role of Pure-Participation controversy happened in Korea's literary world, However, Pure-Participation of that time shows other practical manner respectively for difference of understanding of ‘engagement’ concept and methodology. The goal of this thesis, therefore, is to review Kim Soo Yeong's criticism of poetry in the dimension of discourse and analyse conceptional attitude and methodological for participation-poems. For this, this paper searches the meaning Kim Soo Yeong's criticism of poetry has as aesthetic discourse and critic discourse critically. This Paper chooses Kim Soo Yeong's prose, “Arrangement of Participation Poetry-Focused on Poets in 1960”, “Poems!, Spit out Saliva-Existence of Poetry as Power”, “Anti-Criticism of Poetry” as text for analysis. Throughout this course, this research intends to discusses Kim Soo Yeong's view for writing poem and his manner for reality problem through layer of discourse, and make a foundation to reinterpret meaning structure of his poems in Participation controversy in 1960. Through this study, this paper established that Kim Soo Yeong's criticism of poetry becomes to have meaning about unique logic as critic discourse beyond boundary of modernism and realism, or pure poems and participation poems. That is, this paper demonstrated that Kim Soo Yeong's Criticism of Poems is ontological Criticism of Poems referred to concept of ‘anti-poems’ for artistry as a form and ‘the whole body’ concept for actuality as contents.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2022 are currently being built.