2003, Vol.37, No.

The Korea Spatial Planning Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.2

pISSN : 1229-8638
https://journal.kci.go.kr/krihs

The purpose of this study is to find out the significance and role of the national planning system according to the law of 'Framework Act on the National land' and 'National land planning and Utilization Act', and to clarify the problem of those law and planning system. The process of this study is how to realize the connection and the fitness between the upper and lower plan, mainly its related provision and content of every statutory plan. The problems of the statutory plan below the new Act('Framework Act on the National land’ and 'National land planning and Utilization Act‘) are as follows : Firstly, it causes to the vagueness what is the subject between 'Urban Comprehensive Master Plan' and 'Urban Management Plan’, because of replacing 'City and County Comprehensive Plan‘ with 'Urban Plan’. Secondly, it causes to the confusion with the role of the upper and lower plan, owing to a textual interpretation to complying with the guiding principle and the political direction of 'Province Comprehensive Plan‘ even 'Metropolitan City’. Thirdly, there is no the provision which is the authority to be established 'Urban Comprehensive Master Plan‘ by a provincial governor. The suggestions are as follows : Firstly, it must clearly clarify to 'City and Province Comprehensive Plan‘ not only named by 'Province Comprehensive Plan’, and to giving a definition of 'City and County Comprehensive Plan‘ as its lower system. Secondly, the provision in the new Act which is generally applicable to not divide 'Urban Plan‘ into 'Urban Comprehensive Master Plan’ and 'Urban Management Plan‘ must be definitely prescribed. Thirdly, it must have a correct understanding of the status and authority of a provincial governor, and it also need to prescribe the authority distribution system for their authority to be clear.

The focus of this study is on analyzing regional competition and complementarity of Yeongnam Region in terms of spatial interactions of population with Dendrinos-Sonis Model. Overall, there is no spatial autocorrelation in the population distribution in Yeongnam Area with respect to Moran's I, Local Moran's I and Geary C. It implies that the population of each region is independently distributed, not affected by the degree of population distribution in adjacent regions. But, negative spatial autocorrelation occurred in Busan, Daegu, and Ulsan among cities and counties.

The aim of this paper is to examine the relations of externality and locational conflict in public facilities. Generally locational conflicts related to public facilities in regional and urban area are come from the disagreement or clash about the distribution of external effects from the operation of public facilities. The incident of external effects and concomitant locational conflict pose considerable problems for the decision makers in spatial policy. With the increase of distance from public facility, the distance-decay profile of externality field would be decline, but according to the perception of residents three kinds of response may be suggested: linear, exponential and polynomial profile. The scale, degree and type of locational conflict type depend upon residents' perception on disequilibrium of externality. The externality can be divided into positive and negative effects Public facilities generating negative impacts often bring to stakeholder' strong opposition or violent behaviour because stakeholders feel their dissatisfaction in distributing cost/benefit. Positive impact facilities also result in conflict between regions or residents, but the degree of conflict is lower, because there is a little discrepancy of cost and benefit. Consequently, the successful resolution and management of locational conflict depend on whether stakeholders can ensure the equilibrium of externality or not, and the community impacts including socioeconomic status, strategies, motivation.