KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002181159},
author={김주진 and Ryu Dongju},
title={Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches},
journal={The Korea Spatial Planning Review},
issn={1229-8638},
year={2016},
volume={91},
pages={75-89},
doi={10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005}

TY - JOUR
AU - 김주진
AU - Ryu Dongju
TI - Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches
JO - The Korea Spatial Planning Review
PY - 2016
VL - 91
IS - null
PB - 국토연구원
SP - 75
EP - 89
SN - 1229-8638
AB - While urban regeneration projects have been executed, the need for efficient use of state and public property has also been increased. This study analyzes the local governments’ public property development cases through each public and private participation approach, and examines the main characteristic, issues and policy implications for public property developments. The main results based on the case studies are as follows: first, in case of public entrusted development, it is the most necessary to provide clear rules on appropriate cost recovery for public trustee. Second, under the reliant cooperation between local government and private developer, the private participation development through sale or leasehold of LGP can also be an execution alternative for vest expenses policy projects. In this case, local governments’ clear visions and goals for public property use direction are the fundamental conditions. The various supports for private developments’ performance are also required. And the last, in both approaches, it is important to establish a rational and reasonable development plan based on pre-demand diagnostics and strategies attracting tenants for cost-recovery risks minimization.
KW - Public Property;Public Entrusted Development Approach;Private Participation Development Approach
DO - 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005
ER -

김주진 and Ryu Dongju. (2016). Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 91, 75-89.

김주진 and Ryu Dongju. 2016, "Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches", The Korea Spatial Planning Review, vol.91, pp.75-89. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005

김주진, Ryu Dongju "Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 91 pp.75-89 (2016) : 75.

김주진, Ryu Dongju. Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches. 2016; 91 75-89. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005

김주진 and Ryu Dongju. "Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 91(2016) : 75-89.doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005

김주진; Ryu Dongju. Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches. The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 91, 75-89. doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005

김주진; Ryu Dongju. Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches. The Korea Spatial Planning Review. 2016; 91 75-89. doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005

김주진, Ryu Dongju. Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches. 2016; 91 75-89. Available from: doi:10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005

김주진 and Ryu Dongju. "Case Studies of Local Governments’ Public Property Development and Policy Implications: Focusing on the Public and Private Participation Approaches" The Korea Spatial Planning Review 91(2016) : 75-89.doi: 10.15793/kspr.2016.91..005