The Korea Spatial Planning Review 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.2
-
pISSN : 1229-8638
- https://journal.kci.go.kr/krihs
KJCKorea
Journal Central
A Study on the Urban Living Lab Model connected with Walkability of Cities in India
- The Korea Spatial Planning Review
- 2022, 115(), pp.63~83
- DOI : 10.15793/kspr.2022.115..004
- Publisher : 국토연구원
- Research Area :
- Received : October 17, 2022
- Accepted : December 14, 2022
- Published : December 30, 2022
Yun Ho Kim 1, Myung Moo Lee 1
1서울대학교 아시아연구소
Accredited
ABSTRACT
Innovation processes are highly important in solving big societal challenges that exist on a global scale such as climate change, ageing cities, and health and mobility issues. The role of cities and the urban context is crucial in this aspect. Urban Living Labs is a great methodology for solving these modern city challenges through the complex integration of multi-dimensional solutions. This study analyzed the cases of the Malleswaram Urban Living Lab (M-ULL) in Bengaluru and the Panaji Project Urban Living Lab (P-PULL) in Goa in the context of improving walkability in urban areas in India. The research method was as follows. First, the selected living lab cases were explained according to the innovation development process. Second, the 20 evaluation criteria of the European Network of Living Labs (ENoLL) were mapped to the components of the Extended Business Model Canvas (EBMC). Based on this, a Stakeholder Map of Living Lab was analyzed. Third, the characteristics of Urban Living Lab (ULL) were presented by grouping in the components of the Extended BMC. And based on the suggested characteristics, we offer a Proposition for the sustainable development of an Urban Living Lab.
Statistics
-
208 Viewed
-
138 Downloaded
Tools
Issue List
Citation status
* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.
[book]
손정렬
/ 2022
/ 남아시아의 스마트시티: 구조와 방향
/ 진인진
[journal]
손현식
/ 2021
/
Development of Strategies for Implementing Urban Living Lab: European Case Studies
/ 대한건축학회논문집
/ 대한건축학회
37(6)
: 137~148
[journal]
Akasaka, F.
/ 2022
/ Towards building infrastructure for living lab practices
/ Transactions of Human Interface Society
24(1)
: 11~22
[web]
Ballon, P.
/ 2005
/ Test and experimentation platforms for broadband innovation:Examining European practice
/ SSRN
/ http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn
[journal]
Bartelt, V. L.
/ 2020
/ Enabling collaboration and innovation in Denver’s smart city through a living lab: A social capital perspective
/ European Journal of Information Systems
29(4)
: 369~387
[confproc]
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B.
/ 2009
/ A milieu for innovation: Defining living labs
/ Proceedings of the 2nd ISPIM Innovation Symposium: Simulating Recovery - the Role of Innovation Management
/ The Fashion Institute of Technology
[other]
Bhandari, A.
/ 2021
/ Inclusive Streets Inclusivity In Action
/ Project Urban Living Lab
[journal]
Buhl, J.
/ 2017
/ Rebound effects in living labs: Opportunities for monitoring and mitigating re-spending and time use effects in user integrated innovation design
/ Journal of Cleaner Production
151
: 592~602
[journal]
Chronéer, D.
/ 2019
/ Urban living labs: Towards an integrated understanding of their key components
/ Technology Innovation Management Review
9(3)
: 50~62
[other]
City of Panaj
/ 2018
/ Panaji Smart City Proposal: Annexure 2
/ Corporation of the City of Panaji
[web]
City of Bengaluru
/ 2017
/ Smart City Proposal, Bengaluru:Annexure
/ https://smartcities.gov.in/cities-profiles
[report]
Eriksson, M.
/ 2005
/ Stateof-the-art in utilizing living labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation: A European approach
/ Center for Distance-spanning Technology, Lulea University of Technology
[book]
European Network of Living Labs
/ 2017
/ The Living Lab Methodology Handbook
/ European Network of Living Labs
[other]
European Network of Living Labs
/ 2020
/ LiIving Lab Project 2020: Co-creation and Experimentation in Real Life & Digital Environments
/ European Network of Living Labs
[journal]
Evans, J.
/ 2015
/ Living labs and co-production: university campuses as platforms for sustainability science
/ Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
(16)
: 1~6
[confproc]
Eweg, R.
/ 2014
/ Living Labs: Innovating environments for metropolitan food production
/ Finding Spaces for Productive Cities, Proceedings of the 6th AESOP Sustainable Food Planning Conference
[book]
Farm, D.
/ 2020
/ Universities as Living Labs for Sustainable Development
/ Springer
: 167~182
[report]
Kokareva, A.
/ 2018
/ Do Living Labs Live in Russia?
/ National Research University Higher School of Economics
[journal]
Leminen, S.
/ 2016
/ A framework for understanding the different research avenues of living labs
/ International Journal of Technology Marketing
11(4)
: 399~420
[journal]
Leminen, S.
/ 2017
/ Categorization of innovation tools in living labs
/ Technology Innovation Management Review
7(1)
: 15~25
[journal]
Leminen, S.
/ 2016
/ The effect of network structure on radical innovation in living labs
/ Journal of Business &Industrial Marketing
31(6)
: 743~757
[journal]
Liu, H.
/ 2014
/ Analysis of sustainable urban development approaches in China
/ Habitat Internationa
41
: 24~32
[confproc]
Mastelic, J.
/ 2014
/ How to keep a living lab alive? Applying business model canvas criteria to the ENoLL evaluation process
/ Conference Proceedings of OpenLivingLab Days 2014
/ European Network of Living Labs
[journal]
Nyström, A. G.
/ 2014
/ Actor roles and role patterns influencing innovation in living labs
/ Industrial Marketing Management
43(3)
: 483~495
[journal]
Mastelic, J.
/ 2015
/ How to keep a living lab alive?
/ info
17(4)
: 12~25
[book]
Osterwalder, A.
/ 2010
/ Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries. Game Changers, and Challengers
/ Wiley
[web]
/ Project Urban Living Lab
/ http://www.urbanlivinglabindia.org/success.html
[journal]
Rodrigues, M.
/ 2018
/ Importance of living labs in urban entrepreneurship: A Portuguese case study
/ Journal of Cleaner Production
180
: 780~789
[confproc]
Santonen, T.
/ 2018
/ Comparison of Health and Wellbeing Living Lab Business Models: Preliminary result based on Business Model Canvas Evaluation
/ Research and Innovation Conference Proceedings 2018, OpenLivingLabs Days 2018
/ European Network of Living Labs
: 339~357
[journal]
Schaffers, H.
/ 2012
/ Living Labs for cross-border systemic innovation
/ Technology Innovation Management Review
2(9)
: 25~30
[thesis]
Schuurman, D.
/ 2015
/ Bridging the Gap between Open and User Innovation? Exploring the Value of Living Labs as a Means to Structure User Contribution and Manage Distributed Innovation
/ Ph.D
/ Ghent University
[journal]
Schuurman, D.
/ 2013
/ Open Innovation Processes in Living Lab Innovation Systems:Insights from the LeYLab
/ Technology Innovation Management Review
3(11)
: 28~36
[report]
Sensing Local
/ 2021
/ Walkable Malleswaram: Planning and Assessment Report
/ Sensing Local
[other]
Smart Cities Mission
/ 2021
/ Making a City Smart: Learning from the Smart Cities Mission
/ Smart Cities Mission, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India
[journal]
Ståhlbröst, A.
/ 2012
/ A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs
/ International Journal of Product Development
17(1-2)
: 60~75
[journal]
Zavratnik, V.
/ 2019
/ Living Labs for rural areas: Contextualization of Living Lab frameworks, concepts and practices
/ Sustainability
11(14)
: 1~17
[journal]
Zott, C.
/ 2010
/ Business model design: an activity system perspective
/ Long range planning
43(2-3)
: 216~226
This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.