@article{ART001945738},
author={Sangil Hwang and 박선환 and 전영봉 and 황정배 and Seon-Hong Kang and 김진홍},
title={A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2014},
volume={23},
number={6},
pages={445-452},
doi={10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445}
TY - JOUR
AU - Sangil Hwang
AU - 박선환
AU - 전영봉
AU - 황정배
AU - Seon-Hong Kang
AU - 김진홍
TI - A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2014
VL - 23
IS - 6
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 445
EP - 452
SN - 1225-7184
AB - The objective of this study was to propose the best methodology for estimating soilorganic carbon stocks during environmental assessment for development projects. We comparedthree methodologies which were developed by Korea Environment Corporation(2010), Korea ForestResearch Institute (2006), and Jin-Hyun Jung (1998). We found that the methodology developed byJin-Hyun Jung (1998) shows the worst performance and the methodology of Korea Forest ResearchInstitute (2006) does not reflect a variety of soil types and land use characteristics shown indevelopment project plans. Therefore, we propose that the methodology developed by KoreaEnvironment Corporation (2010) is the most reasonable one because it is internationally acceptedand used for local governments to make the inventory of greenhouse gases as well as to set up itsreduction strategy.
KW - Soil Organic Carbon;Environmental Assessment;Development Projects
DO - 10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
ER -
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang and 김진홍. (2014). A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 23(6), 445-452.
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang and 김진홍. 2014, "A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.23, no.6 pp.445-452. Available from: doi:10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang, 김진홍 "A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 23.6 pp.445-452 (2014) : 445.
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang, 김진홍. A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects. 2014; 23(6), 445-452. Available from: doi:10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang and 김진홍. "A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 23, no.6 (2014) : 445-452.doi: 10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
Sangil Hwang; 박선환; 전영봉; 황정배; Seon-Hong Kang; 김진홍. A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 23(6), 445-452. doi: 10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
Sangil Hwang; 박선환; 전영봉; 황정배; Seon-Hong Kang; 김진홍. A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2014; 23(6) 445-452. doi: 10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang, 김진홍. A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects. 2014; 23(6), 445-452. Available from: doi:10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445
Sangil Hwang, 박선환, 전영봉, 황정배, Seon-Hong Kang and 김진홍. "A Comparative Study for Estimation Methodologies of Soil Organic Carbon Stocks for Environmental Assessment on Development Projects" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 23, no.6 (2014) : 445-452.doi: 10.14249/eia.2014.23.6.445