@article{ART003091661},
author={Jihyeon Park and Hyun-Jin Choi},
title={Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea},
journal={Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment},
issn={1225-7184},
year={2024},
volume={33},
number={3},
pages={131-141}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jihyeon Park
AU - Hyun-Jin Choi
TI - Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea
JO - Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment
PY - 2024
VL - 33
IS - 3
PB - Korean Society Of Environmental Impact Assessment
SP - 131
EP - 141
SN - 1225-7184
AB - The environmental impact assessment have been played important role for sustainable development of the country. Meantime, various studies have been conducted for scientific and effective environmental impact assessment. However the quantitative data such as regional distribution status and development characteristics according to the type of development project, environmental changes due to development projects, and spatial-temporal changes are insufficient, currently. In this study, we investigated the eco-friendliness of major development projects(industrial complex, urban development, tourist complexes, and waste disposal equipments) by integrating the EA-INDEX of each development projects which were reported by prior researches. As a result, we found that the eco-friendliness of development projects tended to gradually increase over time due to the increase in eco-friendliness in the protection of living environment sector. The protection of living environment sector was a major factor in the the eco-friendliness of industrial complexes and urban development projects. In the case of road construction, landfill and tourist complex development projects, the natural environment conservation sector was a major factor in the eco-friendliness of the project. As a result of analyzing the eco-friendliness of development projects by local government, the eco-friendliness of development projects promoted and implemented in Ulsan, Jeonnam, and Gwangju was higher compared to other regions, and it was relatively low in Daejeon, Gyeongnam, and Daegu. This study is considered to be significant in that it conducted a quantitative analysis of the eco-friendliness of development projects carried out over a relatively long period of time throughout South Korea by dividing them by year and local government.
KW - Development projects;Environmental impact assessment;Development status;Eco-friendliness;EA-INDEX
DO -
UR -
ER -
Jihyeon Park and Hyun-Jin Choi. (2024). Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 33(3), 131-141.
Jihyeon Park and Hyun-Jin Choi. 2024, "Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea", Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, vol.33, no.3 pp.131-141.
Jihyeon Park, Hyun-Jin Choi "Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 33.3 pp.131-141 (2024) : 131.
Jihyeon Park, Hyun-Jin Choi. Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea. 2024; 33(3), 131-141.
Jihyeon Park and Hyun-Jin Choi. "Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 33, no.3 (2024) : 131-141.
Jihyeon Park; Hyun-Jin Choi. Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 33(3), 131-141.
Jihyeon Park; Hyun-Jin Choi. Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment. 2024; 33(3) 131-141.
Jihyeon Park, Hyun-Jin Choi. Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea. 2024; 33(3), 131-141.
Jihyeon Park and Hyun-Jin Choi. "Evaluation of Eco-friendliness for Major Development Projects by EA-INDEX in South Korea" Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 33, no.3 (2024) : 131-141.
