KJCKorea
Journal Central

Haeam Kim Eung-jeong(1527∼1620) was a Sijo writer who was active in the middle of the Joseon Dynasty. 70 years after his death, his works were woven into Haeamgagokjip(懈菴歌曲集). However, this document has not been handed down at present, and only his eight Sijos have been handed down through Haeammunjip(懈菴文集). This article examines Kim Eung-jeong's Gagokjip and Sijo. First, in Chapter 2, I looked into the compilation and whereabouts of Haeamgagokjip. Through this, it was estimated that Haeamgagokjip was compiled in the 16th year(1690) of King Sukjong by Kim Eung-jeong's fifth-generation descendant Kim I-ho, and the number of works recovered at this time would not have been much different from that of the first edition of the Haeammunjip. And it was revealed that Haeamgagokjip was again expanded and reorganized into the Haeamseonsaengjip(懈菴先生集), in the 35th year(1709) of King Sukjong by also Kim I-ho. In succession to this work, in the 49th year(1773) of King Yeongjo, the sixth-generation descendant Kim Myeong-eon published the first edition of Haeammunjip. Therefore, the argument of this article is that the Haeamgagokjip is not lost, but, in fact, has been reorganized and delivered through the Haeamseonsaengjip as the Haeammunjip. Then, in Chapter 3, some problems of the Sijo of Haeam related to Haeamgagokjip were highlighted. First, it was revealed that the title of Haeam Sijo were not given directly by the author at the time of creation, but were given by later generations during the compilation of documents such as Haeamgagokjip. Therefore, it was considered that these titles cannot be the decisive basis for understanding the work. In particular, I viewed his work <Moonbanjeong(聞反正)> as such a case, and reinterpreted this work from a standpoint irrelevant to 'Restoration(反正)'. In other words, it was interpreted in relation to the political situation at the time of the enthronement of Gwanghaegun and the subsequent expulsion of the Sobuk faction. Among the sijo of Haeam, <Moonbanjeong> is a work with many questions about understanding the meaning. The main significance of this article is that it specifically clarified such a question. Also, it is meaningful in that this article tried for the first time the study of Haeamgagokjip and the title of Haeam Sijo.

Kim Eung-jeong, Haeamgagokjip, Haeamseonsaengjip, Haeammunjip, Sijo of Haeam, <Moonbanjeong>