@article{ART001434007},
author={Jae Gu Kim},
title={Samuel, God's Failed Plan},
journal={Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies},
issn={1229-0521},
year={2010},
volume={16},
number={1},
pages={74-97},
doi={10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jae Gu Kim
TI - Samuel, God's Failed Plan
JO - Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies
PY - 2010
VL - 16
IS - 1
PB - Korean Society of Old Testament Studies
SP - 74
EP - 97
SN - 1229-0521
AB - This paper is intended to reconsider the reason for Samuel's being. As generally believed, the role of Samuel is to connect the gap between the times of judges and kings. Thus, Samuel has been widely ignored by the shadows of various judges and the glorious king David even though Samuel had performed many important functions, such as prophet, seer, priest and judge. The only person who can be matched in these functions is Moses. This paper tries to investigate the true purpose of God through the personage Samuel. For this research, one of the literary approaches so-called 'intertextuality' is employed, by which the close relations of the crucial expressions appearing both in Moses' story(Ex. 1-15) and Samuel's(I Sam. 1-8) are investigated.
In five stages, Moses and Samuel will be compared. First, their births are related to the 'misery' of a person(people) and God's 'seeing and re- membering.' Second, these two persons must confront the one(s) who "do not know Yahweh." This ignorance invites the catastrophic disaster, which is the third stage. The stories of the ten plagues in Exodus and the Ark of Covenant are matched in terms, expressions and storyline. Fourth, the confrontations of the enemies, Egyptians at the Red-Sea and Philistines at Mizpah take place and God defeats them by the same method. Now the history reaches its peak. At the time of Moses, the next stage after being saved at the Red-Sea by God was 'praising God and worshipping Him as King. Thus, divine kingship was proclaimed. Then at the time of Samuel, the people of Israel had undergone the same salvific power of God. Then, it is obvious that they also proclaimed the kingship of God. But astonishingly they asked for human kingship because of the corruption of Samuel's sons. Samuel failed to discipline his sons for demonstrating divine kingship.
Through these literary comparisons, it is apparent that Samuel is not intended to be a bridge figure between judges and kings. Rather, his true role is to reactualize the time of Moses when God was inaugurated as the only King. But Samuel failed and eventually human kings had to come and go. This is why the title of this study is 'Samuel, God's Failed Plan.'
KW - Intertextuality Samuel Moses Kingship of Yahweh Human Kingship
DO - 10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
ER -
Jae Gu Kim. (2010). Samuel, God's Failed Plan. Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies, 16(1), 74-97.
Jae Gu Kim. 2010, "Samuel, God's Failed Plan", Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies, vol.16, no.1 pp.74-97. Available from: doi:10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
Jae Gu Kim "Samuel, God's Failed Plan" Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 16.1 pp.74-97 (2010) : 74.
Jae Gu Kim. Samuel, God's Failed Plan. 2010; 16(1), 74-97. Available from: doi:10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
Jae Gu Kim. "Samuel, God's Failed Plan" Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 16, no.1 (2010) : 74-97.doi: 10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
Jae Gu Kim. Samuel, God's Failed Plan. Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies, 16(1), 74-97. doi: 10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
Jae Gu Kim. Samuel, God's Failed Plan. Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies. 2010; 16(1) 74-97. doi: 10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
Jae Gu Kim. Samuel, God's Failed Plan. 2010; 16(1), 74-97. Available from: doi:10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
Jae Gu Kim. "Samuel, God's Failed Plan" Korean Journal of Old Testament Studies 16, no.1 (2010) : 74-97.doi: 10.24333/jkots.2010.16.1.74
