@article{ART001371755},
author={안경섭},
title={중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구},
journal={Korean Society and Public Administration},
issn={1225-8652},
year={2009},
volume={20},
number={2},
pages={29-57}
TY - JOUR
AU - 안경섭
TI - 중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구
JO - Korean Society and Public Administration
PY - 2009
VL - 20
IS - 2
PB - Seoul Association For Public Administration
SP - 29
EP - 57
SN - 1225-8652
AB - ince 2008 under Lee Myung Bak administration, a great number of changes have taken places within Public Service Evaluation to achieve better practicality, validity and efficiency. In particular, Innovation-Management Evaluation has been reduced in size and changed its name and merged into Evaluation of Change Management which is one of the evaluation items in Organizational Capacity Evaluation. Furthermore, its evaluation method has been changed from specific evaluation to self-evaluation and its evaluation range also has been rearranged. Naturally, new demands arose to check and see whether the evaluation activity is adequately taken places to hold its new evaluation purpose. To meet such a demands, a suitable Meta-evaluation Model has been developed and executed under Evaluation of Change Management.
KW - Meta-Evaluation;Evaluation of Change Management;internal evaluation;etc
DO -
UR -
ER -
안경섭. (2009). 중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구. Korean Society and Public Administration, 20(2), 29-57.
안경섭. 2009, "중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구", Korean Society and Public Administration, vol.20, no.2 pp.29-57.
안경섭 "중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구" Korean Society and Public Administration 20.2 pp.29-57 (2009) : 29.
안경섭. 중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구. 2009; 20(2), 29-57.
안경섭. "중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구" Korean Society and Public Administration 20, no.2 (2009) : 29-57.
안경섭. 중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구. Korean Society and Public Administration, 20(2), 29-57.
안경섭. 중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구. Korean Society and Public Administration. 2009; 20(2) 29-57.
안경섭. 중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구. 2009; 20(2), 29-57.
안경섭. "중앙행정기관의 변화관리평가에 대한 메타평가 연구" Korean Society and Public Administration 20, no.2 (2009) : 29-57.