KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART001421706},
author={Kim, Chang Soo},
title={개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부},
journal={Korean Society and Public Administration},
issn={1225-8652},
year={2010},
volume={20},
number={4},
pages={133-162}

TY - JOUR
AU - Kim, Chang Soo
TI - 개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부
JO - Korean Society and Public Administration
PY - 2010
VL - 20
IS - 4
PB - Seoul Association For Public Administration
SP - 133
EP - 162
SN - 1225-8652
AB - Korean society is now on the horns of a dilemma over the degree of development and conservation. The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs promises to administrate our territory creatively and flexibly so that more spaces are available for needs. The conservers also agree that the size of our territory is quite limited compared to our population and volume of the economy, so we should maximize the productivity of our territory including the use of 4 major rivers in the current society of unlimited global competition. But the conservers criticize the overdevelopment and lack of democratic procedures of the developers. The purpose of this paper is to determine the causes of the policy dilemma between the developers and the conservers for sustainable development over 4 major river restoration project. The efficient or redundant structure and the frame conflict of the governmental departments were examined for policy coordination through check-and-balance system. The disharmony of the surface and deep frame, the conflict of the fast and slow frame and the framing process of the developers and the conservers were also anatomized. The findings were as follows. First, the different structure but same frame between Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs was important cause of the dilemma and unsatisfactory policy result. So the autonomy-based check-and-balance system of governmental structure is good for excluding policy errors and arriving at a consensus. Second, the dilemma between the development-oriented coalition (government and ruling party) and the conservation-oriented coalition(civil society and opposition party) was caused by the government’s top-down and authoritarian policy approach style and the frame difference on the 4 major river restoration project. In conclusion, I suggest that the balanced governmental structure based on redundancy and authentic discourse based on procedural rationality be needed for the consensus building.
KW - policy dilemma;redundant governmental structure;frame analysis;consensus building;four major river restoration project
DO -
UR -
ER -

Kim, Chang Soo. (2010). 개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부. Korean Society and Public Administration, 20(4), 133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo. 2010, "개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부", Korean Society and Public Administration, vol.20, no.4 pp.133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo "개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부" Korean Society and Public Administration 20.4 pp.133-162 (2010) : 133.

Kim, Chang Soo. 개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부. 2010; 20(4), 133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo. "개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부" Korean Society and Public Administration 20, no.4 (2010) : 133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo. 개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부. Korean Society and Public Administration, 20(4), 133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo. 개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부. Korean Society and Public Administration. 2010; 20(4) 133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo. 개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부. 2010; 20(4), 133-162.

Kim, Chang Soo. "개발과 보전의 딜레마: 구조와 프레임의 해부" Korean Society and Public Administration 20, no.4 (2010) : 133-162.