본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Institutional Discursive Approach to Policy Controversy: The Probabilities of Consensus-building through Deliberation

  • Korean Society and Public Administration
  • Abbr : KSPA
  • 2012, 22(4), pp.1-26
  • Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
  • Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

김창수 1

1부경대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to analyze the Jeju naval base construction controversy from the viewpoint of the institutional discursive approach and to review other controversial cases in order to generalize institutional discursive theory. The findings are as follows: First, the internal and situational conditions such as the historical and cultural traditions of the conservational and peaceful island had an effect on the controversy. Second, the unpredictable and unfair institutions for development also affected the controversy. Third, the policy approaches of the government and the navy were one-sided without deliberation and authentic discourse, which led to the failure of consensus-building between the developers and the conservationists. Fourth, mediation and arbitration were not used for resolution of the controversy, but three litigation cases are proceeding. Finally, the study attempts to generalize the institutional discursive approach through comparisons to cases both at home and abroad.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.