@article{ART002085991},
author={leesunwoo and Kyunghoon Cho},
title={Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period},
journal={Korean Society and Public Administration},
issn={1225-8652},
year={2016},
volume={26},
number={4},
pages={265-286}
TY - JOUR
AU - leesunwoo
AU - Kyunghoon Cho
TI - Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period
JO - Korean Society and Public Administration
PY - 2016
VL - 26
IS - 4
PB - Seoul Association For Public Administration
SP - 265
EP - 286
SN - 1225-8652
AB - Public service values is very broad and complex concept. Public service value is the quality of the civil service to be retained. Public service value seems to vary depending on the definition, emphasizing that hold many values throughout. The purpose of this study is to identify empirically the service value of public officials that are recognized today and that reveal the relationship between the influencing factors for the purpose of impact.
The results confirmed that officials were aware of the accountability and innovation, organizational commitment as a major factor of public service value. The influence factors on public value was constructed motivation, leadership, conflict management, job satisfaction. Depending on the service period, differences in perception between new employees and existing employees were identified. Although for the recognition of the public value is a big difference between the two groups was not confirmed, but consistently it has been found that the new employees recognize innovative value higher. Conversely, job satisfaction, conflict management and leadership factor was recognized in the existing staff more highly, however motivational factors has been shown to recognized in new employees higher.
Results of Structural equation analysis to determine the factors that affect the public service value showed that motivation, leadership, conflict management directly affect the public service value. Meanwhile, the leadership has been found to have a negative effect on innovation and organizational commitment. On the one hand, through intergroup difference analysis on the structural model has been found new employees were tend to be more sensitive.
KW - Public service value;Public service value factor;Multi-group structural equation analysis
DO -
UR -
ER -
leesunwoo and Kyunghoon Cho. (2016). Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period. Korean Society and Public Administration, 26(4), 265-286.
leesunwoo and Kyunghoon Cho. 2016, "Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period", Korean Society and Public Administration, vol.26, no.4 pp.265-286.
leesunwoo, Kyunghoon Cho "Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period" Korean Society and Public Administration 26.4 pp.265-286 (2016) : 265.
leesunwoo, Kyunghoon Cho. Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period. 2016; 26(4), 265-286.
leesunwoo and Kyunghoon Cho. "Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period" Korean Society and Public Administration 26, no.4 (2016) : 265-286.
leesunwoo; Kyunghoon Cho. Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period. Korean Society and Public Administration, 26(4), 265-286.
leesunwoo; Kyunghoon Cho. Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period. Korean Society and Public Administration. 2016; 26(4) 265-286.
leesunwoo, Kyunghoon Cho. Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period. 2016; 26(4), 265-286.
leesunwoo and Kyunghoon Cho. "Empirical Research on the Public Service Value of Government Employee: Focusing on the Employment Period" Korean Society and Public Administration 26, no.4 (2016) : 265-286.
