본문 바로가기
  • Home

A Study for Assessment and Rating Instrument of Children’s Education and Care

  • Korean Society and Public Administration
  • Abbr : KSPA
  • 2017, 27(4), pp.53-79
  • Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
  • Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration

Kim Junhyun 1

1부경대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to suggest some policy alternatives that are necessary for the evaluation and certification system to be an effective policy instrument. To this end, the daycare center certification assessment method and result disclosure method are summarized, and the results of the focused group interview(FGI) are presented. We also looked at Australian cases and searched for alternatives to improve the problems revealed through FGI. According to these interviews and reviews, we recommend to maintain the current averaging method in the rating system, and to expand the essential indicators/area and raise the baseline scores. In addition to the certification, we recommend an ‘excellent' grade has been established in the certification level. However, we pointed out that the absolute evaluation method would be more appropriate than the relative evaluation method in assigning the ’excellent' rating. Finally, we suggest if 'excellent' rating is established, only the rating information will be disclosed externally, and the more detail information should be disclosed only to the center.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.