본문 바로가기
  • Home

Comparison of Participatory Budgeting and Cooperative Redesign

  • Korean Society and Public Administration
  • Abbr : KSPA
  • 2019, 30(3), pp.59-77
  • Publisher : Seoul Association For Public Administration
  • Research Area : Social Science > Public Administration
  • Received : October 18, 2019
  • Accepted : November 10, 2019
  • Published : November 30, 2019

YOON, SUNGIL 1 Lim Dong Wan 2

1한국지방행정연구원
2단국대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study is to analyze the network structure and characteristics between governments in the Participatory Budgeting (PB) operated at the local government level and the central government level, and to present a cooperative cooperation measures between the governments through this analysis. The PB in South Korea is divided into the citizen PB implemented by the local government and the national PB implemented by the central government. Citizen PB has been gradually expanded since it was first introduced in north district of Gwangju Metropolitan City. By revising the 2011 Local Finance Law and making the citizen PB mandatory, PB was implemented nationwide. On the other hand, the national PB implemented a model project in 2017 and has been fully implemented since 2018. However, although the citizen PB and the national PB have similar objectives, the cooperative relationship is not high. In this study, we investigate the significance of the PB, construct an analysis model through the theory of Intergovernment Relations (IGR), analyze the relationship between the government of the citizen PB and the national PB, present a proposal for cooperative cooperation. As cooperation measures for redesign of PB, we present cooperation such as project promotion, budget school, project proposal, and construction of a PB platform for project evaluation.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.