KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002531697},
author={Choi, Seong Rak},
title={A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items},
journal={Korean Society and Public Administration},
issn={1225-8652},
year={2019},
volume={30},
number={3},
pages={153-174}

TY - JOUR
AU - Choi, Seong Rak
TI - A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items
JO - Korean Society and Public Administration
PY - 2019
VL - 30
IS - 3
PB - Seoul Association For Public Administration
SP - 153
EP - 174
SN - 1225-8652
AB - Currently, self-regulation is being made on random items in the game industry. For the first time in 2008, self-regulation were put in place but were not implemented at that time. In 2015, the self-regulation was reorganized, and since the self-regulation have been revised in 2017 and 2018, the enforcement rate is gradually increasing. Since the introduction of random items in the market in the mid-2000s, the need for regulation of random items has been raised. As a regulatory method, the self-regulation was preferred to government regulation. It was argued that self-regulation has more advantages than government regulation as a regulation such as the use of professional knowledge, environmental adaptability and low execution cost. In order to take advantage of such self-regulation, self-regulation is introduced for random item regulation. However, there may be a limit on whether the self-regulation of random item has advantages as self-regulation. In this study, we want to examine whether the self-regulation of random items really has a positive side as self-regulation. We analyze the positive and negative aspects of the self-regulation of random items. A self-regulation is generally seen as an advantage over expertise, efficiency and adaptability. However, the analysis of random items reveals that the self-regulation of random items is not higher than government regulation in this respect. There is no specialty in the self-regulation of random items, and it is hard to say that regulatory efficiency is higher than that in government regulation. It is adaptable, but changes too frequently, which is not a benefit but a disadvantage. There are limitations in terms of representativeness and in terms of accountability that are recognized as necessary for the proper operation of self-regulation. In other words, the self-regulation of random items does not show its merits as self-regulation, and it has the characteristics of compulsory self-regulation and repressive self-regulation to avoid direct government regulation.
KW - self-regulation;government regulation;regulatory evaluation;game regulation;random items
DO -
UR -
ER -

Choi, Seong Rak. (2019). A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items. Korean Society and Public Administration, 30(3), 153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak. 2019, "A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items", Korean Society and Public Administration, vol.30, no.3 pp.153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak "A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items" Korean Society and Public Administration 30.3 pp.153-174 (2019) : 153.

Choi, Seong Rak. A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items. 2019; 30(3), 153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak. "A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items" Korean Society and Public Administration 30, no.3 (2019) : 153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak. A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items. Korean Society and Public Administration, 30(3), 153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak. A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items. Korean Society and Public Administration. 2019; 30(3) 153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak. A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items. 2019; 30(3), 153-174.

Choi, Seong Rak. "A Study on the Adequacy of Self-regulation about Random Items" Korean Society and Public Administration 30, no.3 (2019) : 153-174.