@article{ART001304816},
author={Jeong-Taek Kim and Hahn Bock-Hee},
title={A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model},
journal={Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society},
issn={2466-2542},
year={2008},
volume={39},
number={4},
pages={71-96},
doi={10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jeong-Taek Kim
AU - Hahn Bock-Hee
TI - A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model
JO - Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
PY - 2008
VL - 39
IS - 4
PB - Korean Library And Information Science Society
SP - 71
EP - 96
SN - 2466-2542
AB - Recently, some universities and university libraries have implemented performance management system as a part of managerial innovation, and they have either implemented or are considering implementing BSC. Thus there are needs to develop performance indicator, which is a tool measuring performance of university libraries, based on BSC, and to assess the developed performance indicator's relative weights to analyze which indicators are essential to fulfill and improve the university library's mission. The performance indicators are also affected by the characteristics and perspectives of the people who develop them during the development process. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the differences among the professional groups in relative weighting of the performance indicator. The purposes of this study are to derive a university library performance indicator model based on BSC, to analyze the importance of each evaluation factor of the derived performance indicator model, and to analyze the differences among the professional groups in relative weighting of the performance indicator model.
KW - University Libraries;Performance Indicator;Balanced Scorecard;Relative Weights;Model Design;Performance Management System;Evaluation Factor
DO - 10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
ER -
Jeong-Taek Kim and Hahn Bock-Hee. (2008). A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 71-96.
Jeong-Taek Kim and Hahn Bock-Hee. 2008, "A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model", Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, vol.39, no.4 pp.71-96. Available from: doi:10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
Jeong-Taek Kim, Hahn Bock-Hee "A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model" Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 39.4 pp.71-96 (2008) : 71.
Jeong-Taek Kim, Hahn Bock-Hee. A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model. 2008; 39(4), 71-96. Available from: doi:10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
Jeong-Taek Kim and Hahn Bock-Hee. "A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model" Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 39, no.4 (2008) : 71-96.doi: 10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
Jeong-Taek Kim; Hahn Bock-Hee. A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 39(4), 71-96. doi: 10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
Jeong-Taek Kim; Hahn Bock-Hee. A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society. 2008; 39(4) 71-96. doi: 10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
Jeong-Taek Kim, Hahn Bock-Hee. A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model. 2008; 39(4), 71-96. Available from: doi:10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
Jeong-Taek Kim and Hahn Bock-Hee. "A Study on the Relative Weights for the Development of University Library Performance Indicator Model" Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 39, no.4 (2008) : 71-96.doi: 10.16981/kliss.39.4.200812.71
