Study on Readers about Library and Information Science Fields’ Articles by Analyzing Mendeley (Mendeley를 통한 문헌정보학 주요 분야 연구 논문의 독자 분석)

CHO JANE (조재인)

doi:10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.77

Study on Readers about Library and Information Science Fields’ Articles by Analyzing Mendeley

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
Abbr : JKLISS
2017, 48(1), pp.77-97
DOI : 10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.77
Publisher : Korean Library And Information Science Society
Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Library and Information Science
Received : February 17, 2017
Accepted : March 8, 2017

CHO JANE ¹

¹인천대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

With reference management tool based on web, we could understand not only impact about non-author, such as hand-on worker, educator, who are out of academia, but also trace the subject fields of readers and their status. This study by analyzing mendeley, understand what kinds of subject fields and status of readers read library and information science field articles. As a result of analyzing the status and the major of the reader, readers were distributed in the fields of business administration, education and so on, and according to the reader's major, there was a significant difference (p = .000) between the subject area of relatively read a lot. By the way, as the result of relational analysis between citation rate and numbers of mendeley readership about medeley saved articles, correlation coefficient shows 0.585, however as the result of relational analysis limiting the groups, in case of author group who tends to read the articles for citing, correlation coefficient shows 0.619. On the other hand, non-author group shows 0.384.

KEYWORDS

Altmetrics, Citation Rates, Library and Information Science, Mendeley, Social Reference Management

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

[thesis] 박진영 / 2012 / 근거중심의학(EBM) 정보서비스 도입을 위한 연구 : 임상 전공의의 정보이용행태와 EBM에 대한 인식을 바탕으로 / 석사 / 명지대학교 대학원

[journal] 조재인 / 2015 / A Study about Scholarly Impact Measurement through Altmetrics / 한국도서관·정보학회지 / 한국도서관·정보학회 46(1) : 65~81

[journal] 林和弘 / 2013 / 研究論文の影響度を測定する新しい動き : 論文単位で即時かつ多面的な測定を可能とするAltmetrics / 科学技術動向 3-4 : 20~29

[journal] Aabo, S. / 2012 / Use of Library Space and the Library as Place / Library & Information Science Research 34(2) : 138~149

[confproc] Alhoori, H. / 2016 / Do Altmetrics Follow the Crowd or Does the Crowd Follow Altmetrics? / IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries : 375~378

[web] Bornmann, Lutz / 2014 / Alternative Metrics in Scientometrics : A Meta-analysis of Research into Three Altmetricss / http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.8010

[journal] Charnigo, L. / 2007 / Checking out Facebook.com : The Impact of a Digital Trend on Academic Libraries / Information Technology and Libraries 26(1)

[journal] Clark, T. / 2007 / The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction / MIS Quarterly 31(3) : 579~615

[journal] Connaway, S. / 2011 / If It is too Inconvenient I'm not Going After It: Convenience As a Critical Factor in Information-seeking Behaviors / Library and Information Science Research 33 : 179~190

[journal] Costas, R. / 2015 / Do 'altmetrics' Correlate with Citations? Extensive Comparison of Altmetric Indicators with Citations from a Multidisciplinary Perspective / Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(10) : 2003~2019

[journal] Hammarfelt, B. / 2014 / Using Altmetrics for Assessing Research Impact in the Humanities / Scientometrics 101(2) : 1419~1430

[confproc] Haustein, S. / 2013 / Coverage and Adoption of Altmetrics Sources in the Bibliometric Community / Proceedings of ISSI 2013 -14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference 1 : 468~483

[journal] Haustein, S. / 2014 / Tweeting Biomedicine: An Analysis of Tweets and Citations in the Biomedical Literature / Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(4) : 656~669

[journal] Leidner, D. / 2006 / Review : A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict / Mis Quarterly 30(2) : 357~399

[journal] Lewis, D. / 2012 / The Inevitability of Open Access / College & Research Libraries 73(5) : 493~506

[confproc] Li, N. / 2016 / Identifying Influential Scholars in Academic Social Media Platforms / Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining ASONAM 13 : 608~614

[journal] Mohammadi, E. / 2016 / Mendeley Readership Altmetrics for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Research Evaluation and Knowledge Flows / Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65(8) : 1627~1638

[journal] Mohammadi, E. / 2015 / Who Reads Research Articles? An Altmetrics Analysis of Mendeley User Categories / Journal of the American Society for Information Science 66(9) : 1832~1846

[journal] Ortega, J. L. / 2015 / Relationship between Altmetric and Bibliometric Indicators across Academic Social Sites: The Case of CSIC’s members / Journal of Informetrics 9(1) : 39~49

[journal] Petter, S. / 2008 / Measuring Information Systems Success:Models, Dimensions, Measures, and Interrelationships / European Journal of nformation System 17(3) : 236~263

[journal] Rourke, L. / 2007 / Barriers to Online Critical Discourse / International Journal Of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2(1) : 105~126

[journal] Schlögl, C. / 2014 / Comparison of Downloads, Citations and Readership Data for Two Information Systems / Journals Scientometrics 101(2) : 1113~1128

[journal] Tenopir, C. / 2009 / Variations in Article Seeking and Reading Patterns of Academics: What Makes a Difference? / Library & Information Science Research 31(3) : 139~148

[journal] Zahedi, Z. / 2016 / How Well Developed are Altmetrics? A Cross-disciplinary Analysis of the Presence of ‘Alternative Metrics’ in Scientific Publications / Scientometrics 101(2) : 1491~1513

KJCKorea
Journal Central

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.02

Study on Readers about Library and Information Science Fields’ Articles by Analyzing Mendeley

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society 2023 KCI Impact Factor : 1.02

Study on Readers about Library and Information Science Fields’ Articles by Analyzing Mendeley

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

Statistics

Tools

Issue List

Citation status

KCI Citation Counts (2)

REFERENCES (24) * References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

Search PDF

Citation

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.