본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Problem of Language and Representation in Leibniz’s Philosophy

Seongho Kim 1

1고려대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

In Leibniz’s philosophy we can find two different approaches to language. In early days he pursued to construct a ideal, artificial language, namely ‘universal characteristics’. But in his mature philosophical period his interest concentrated on the ordinary natural language. Then, what is the relation between these two approaches and what is the reason of this shift?According to ‘Cassirer thesis’ Leibniz’s ultimate goal was the construction of an ideal, universal system of language and his discussions about natural languages were superfluous. But recent authors strongly opposed ‘Cassirer thesis’ and took pains to stress the continuity and consistency between Leibniz’s accounts of artificial and natural language. The best evidence for the continuity of his view of language is the fact that he draws no definitive line between two languages. His ultimate goal was not a certain system of language, but an ideal instrument for our inference and communication. Accordingly in his view of language the relation of representation, which unites a character and what it signifies, plays a crucial role. But regrettably Leibniz left no sufficient accounts about linguistic representation.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.

This paper was written with support from the National Research Foundation of Korea.