본문 바로가기
  • Home

Social Isolation, Social Mobility Frustration, and Minority Inclusion in Korea

  • The Journal of Multicultural Society
  • 2026, 19(3), pp.377~413
  • DOI : 10.14431/jms.2026.10.19.3.377
  • Publisher : Research Institute of Asian Women
  • Research Area : Social Science > Social Science in general
  • Received : July 30, 2026
  • Accepted : October 7, 2026
  • Published : October 30, 2026

Sol Jung ORD ID 1,  HyunHwan Park 2

1가톨릭관동대학교 보건의료융합연구소
2신한대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study examines whether two forms of deprivation, social isolation (relational deprivation) and frustrated social mobility (status deprivation), reduce or increase minority inclusion, contrasting a resource competition pathway with a suffering-based empathy pathway. Using five waves of the Korean Survey on Social Integration (2021~2025; N = 41,148), we estimated three-level models in which individuals are nested in province-years and provinces, and linked regional unemployment rates, shares of foreign residents, and shares of single-person households. Social isolation was associated with greater minority inclusion, consistent with the empathy pathway, and the association was strongest toward the most socially distant groups, such as sexual minorities and ex-offenders. Neither mobility frustration nor the interaction between the two forms of deprivation was significant. Local belonging increased minority inclusion and amplified the effect of social isolation, whereas regional contextual variables explained little of the regional variation. The effect of social isolation varied considerably across provinces and years, indicating that it is conditional rather than universal. These findings challenge the assumption that deprivation necessarily breeds exclusion and suggest that different types of deprivation shape attitudes toward minorities through different pathways.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.