@article{ART001908691},
author={Kwak, Jin O},
title={The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law},
journal={Journal of Japanese Culture},
issn={1226-3605},
year={2014},
number={62},
pages={161-176},
doi={10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kwak, Jin O
TI - The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law
JO - Journal of Japanese Culture
PY - 2014
VL - null
IS - 62
PB - The Japanese Culture Association Of Korea (Jcak)
SP - 161
EP - 176
SN - 1226-3605
AB - Title: The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law This paper analyzes Japan's claim over Dokdo in three terms; first, indigenous territory argument, second, terra nullius argument, and third, international law argument. First, the indigenous territory argument claims that Japan recognized Dokdo earlier than Korea. An example is that Japanese fishers fished in Dokdo since the 17th century, and thus they occupied Dokdo. Second, according to the terra nullius theory, Japan first claimed the terra nullius and intimated it as Japanese territory on Shimane Prefecture's gazette, Feb.22, 1905. Third, according to international law, the Japanese government criticizes Korea for illegally occupying Japanese territory, which is legally Japanese based on the first two arguments. Regarding each of these three arguments, this paper points out the flaws and limits.
KW - Indigenous Territory Theory;Terra Nullius Theory;International Law
DO - 10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
ER -
Kwak, Jin O. (2014). The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law. Journal of Japanese Culture, 62, 161-176.
Kwak, Jin O. 2014, "The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law", Journal of Japanese Culture, no.62, pp.161-176. Available from: doi:10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
Kwak, Jin O "The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law" Journal of Japanese Culture 62 pp.161-176 (2014) : 161.
Kwak, Jin O. The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law. 2014; 62 : 161-176. Available from: doi:10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
Kwak, Jin O. "The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law" Journal of Japanese Culture no.62(2014) : 161-176.doi: 10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
Kwak, Jin O. The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law. Journal of Japanese Culture, 62, 161-176. doi: 10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
Kwak, Jin O. The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law. Journal of Japanese Culture. 2014; 62 161-176. doi: 10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
Kwak, Jin O. The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law. 2014; 62 : 161-176. Available from: doi:10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
Kwak, Jin O. "The Flaws and Limits of Japan's Claims over Dokdo ; In Terms of Indigenous Territory Theory, Terra Nullius Theory, and International Law" Journal of Japanese Culture no.62(2014) : 161-176.doi: 10.21481/jbunka..62.201408.161
