본문 바로가기
  • Home

Study on "hazuda" in adnominal clause

Jeong-Hee Lee 1

1경북대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

The expression of adnominal clauses using "hazuda" shows some difference in its acceptance according to its meaning or usage. As a result, in the "relative clause", the usage of "yosou" is sometimes allowed within the adnominal clauses, but its frequency of occurrence is less. And the "discrepancy" type occupies most of the cases. The usage of "satori" is not accepted. Also, examining the contextual situation, in the known stage, "discrepancy" between the consequences of reasoning and status quo occurs in most cases and leads to a consequent contradictory situation. On the other hand, in the unknown stage, the "discrepancy" does not occur. The Limiting way is different in the depending on the "discrepancy". Meanwhile, if "discrepancy" exists, it becomes the non-limiting expression of adnominal clauses. If "discrepancy" does not exist, it becomes limiting expression of adnominal clause. Next, in the "appositive clause", if there is no intervention of "toiu", "hazuda" is not allowed. On the other hand, when there is an intervention of "toiu", the main noun is used the "noun thought".

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.