KJCKorea
Journal Central

As far as the interpretation of this work and electrical junction, whether related to akutagawa. That is leading research into the history, whereas, this novel and criticism of these things. First, the objective is to target the <me> narrative is ruled out. As a result there was a narrative of the landscape. That description is looking at ways to <me> on the objective behind the speaker's third-person, whilst extremely technical and how <me>. In this way, the <me>, had been a target objective narrative are precluded. As a result, leaving only the narrative of the landscape. Second, the tangerine color brilliant moment thought of <Charlton's impressive> impressed. There has never been a revelation, in that moment of touching and <me> cornelius, as in For example, fatigue and boredom did can you even have a life worth living actively take it was interpreted as a side. It is on top of the life in sight, and akutagawa small's life, but to see Toro comes from there is constructed by replacing the need to do art museum works would need to be analyzed. These results, but will this work on a textbook author's autobiographical works by escaping from the fact expressed the essence of.

Landscapes and images of correspondence, Historical interpretation of the proof-of-concept note, Charlton's impressive