@article{ART002028972},
author={Debbie McMullen and Rhett McClean and Sok Cheon Pak},
title={A critique: The good and bad of a review},
journal={CELLMED},
issn={3022-6805},
year={2015},
volume={5},
number={3},
pages={16-16},
doi={10.5667/tang.2015.0008}
TY - JOUR
AU - Debbie McMullen
AU - Rhett McClean
AU - Sok Cheon Pak
TI - A critique: The good and bad of a review
JO - CELLMED
PY - 2015
VL - 5
IS - 3
PB - Cellmed Orthocellular Medicine and Pharmaceutical Association
SP - 16
EP - 16
SN - 3022-6805
AB - Evidence based medicine involves using both the individual clinician’s expertise and the current best available external clinical evidence from systematic research in deciding on the appropriate care for individual patients. The current approach to evidence based practice in healthcare adds a third component which is patient values. Evidence based practice is thus a triad, in which the practitioner’s expertise, research evidence and the patient’s values are all given consideration. The balance to be struck between them depends on the individual case. The literature indicates that complementary medicine practitioners are moving away from traditional knowledge and towards the use of evidence based practice in their clinical discussions. In the context of the daily practice of complementary medicine practitioners and their continuing development of their knowledge base of evidence based practice, this short review discusses the good and bad of a review journal article.
KW - critique;review;methodology;bias;evidence
DO - 10.5667/tang.2015.0008
ER -
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean and Sok Cheon Pak. (2015). A critique: The good and bad of a review. CELLMED, 5(3), 16-16.
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean and Sok Cheon Pak. 2015, "A critique: The good and bad of a review", CELLMED, vol.5, no.3 pp.16-16. Available from: doi:10.5667/tang.2015.0008
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean, Sok Cheon Pak "A critique: The good and bad of a review" CELLMED 5.3 pp.16-16 (2015) : 16.
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean, Sok Cheon Pak. A critique: The good and bad of a review. 2015; 5(3), 16-16. Available from: doi:10.5667/tang.2015.0008
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean and Sok Cheon Pak. "A critique: The good and bad of a review" CELLMED 5, no.3 (2015) : 16-16.doi: 10.5667/tang.2015.0008
Debbie McMullen; Rhett McClean; Sok Cheon Pak. A critique: The good and bad of a review. CELLMED, 5(3), 16-16. doi: 10.5667/tang.2015.0008
Debbie McMullen; Rhett McClean; Sok Cheon Pak. A critique: The good and bad of a review. CELLMED. 2015; 5(3) 16-16. doi: 10.5667/tang.2015.0008
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean, Sok Cheon Pak. A critique: The good and bad of a review. 2015; 5(3), 16-16. Available from: doi:10.5667/tang.2015.0008
Debbie McMullen, Rhett McClean and Sok Cheon Pak. "A critique: The good and bad of a review" CELLMED 5, no.3 (2015) : 16-16.doi: 10.5667/tang.2015.0008
