@article{ART001724238},
author={JUNG, JAE SEO},
title={Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture},
journal={Journal of Chinese Language and Literature},
issn={1225-083X},
year={2012},
number={61},
pages={525-548},
doi={10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525}
TY - JOUR
AU - JUNG, JAE SEO
TI - Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture
JO - Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
PY - 2012
VL - null
IS - 61
PB - Chinese Literary Society Of Yeong Nam
SP - 525
EP - 548
SN - 1225-083X
AB - 本文先把中国文明起源论分为外来说和自生说，再把自生说分为单元論和多元論而讨论后，对整个论旨进行有批判性的考察，同时对与古代韩国文化的关联性加些附论了。其结果：外来说，即西方起源说带有浓厚的东方主义(Orientalism)；自生说的单元论受到了中华主义(Sinocentrism)的影响。以后多元论因考古发掘的扩大与自省的学风逐渐代替了单元论。从整体构建来看，中国文明起源论有着从外来说到自生说、在自生说里面从单元论到多元论的走进倾向。但是由于红山文化的发现，近来渐露新版单元论的征兆。在这种变迁过程当中，该注目的是在考古学内面上不断运转的神话学的存在。神话学依靠考古学得到旁证，但归纳考古学的结果时神话学反而作为先入之见起作用。如上文所述，中国文明起源论带有明显的后者的倾向。那么，要打消这种倾向、达到更加客观的文明论的阶段，往后, 中国文明起源论需要什么样的态度?本文以对其提示几个观点代替结论。1)中国神话学要解构自己内藏的中原中心主义，而构筑基于多元主义的展望的神话体系。互文性的(intertextual)神话体系将与考古学上的多元主义构成表里关系。2)把外来说，即西方起源说只看成东方主义，是个未摆脱现代以来的被害意识的佐证。外来说当中肯定的部分需要积极的检讨，所以我们说明中国文明的形成时，积极地采取开放的态度。3)对西方主张多元论、在东亚内部主张单元论，我们脱离这种矛盾的观点，扬弃从来的根源主义的态度而在对位法的层面上把握中国周围文明的存在。从这种观点来看，对红山文化的新版单元论内含着相当的问题。
KW -
DO - 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
ER -
JUNG, JAE SEO. (2012). Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 61, 525-548.
JUNG, JAE SEO. 2012, "Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture", Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, no.61, pp.525-548. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
JUNG, JAE SEO "Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 61 pp.525-548 (2012) : 525.
JUNG, JAE SEO. Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture. 2012; 61 : 525-548. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
JUNG, JAE SEO. "Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.61(2012) : 525-548.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
JUNG, JAE SEO. Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 61, 525-548. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
JUNG, JAE SEO. Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature. 2012; 61 525-548. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
JUNG, JAE SEO. Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture. 2012; 61 : 525-548. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
JUNG, JAE SEO. "Mythlogy? or Archaeology? - Reexamination of the Origin of Chinese Culture" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.61(2012) : 525-548.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.525
