@article{ART001726092},
author={LEE, JONG MU},
title={A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ},
journal={Journal of Chinese Language and Literature},
issn={1225-083X},
year={2012},
number={61},
pages={403-429},
doi={10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403}
TY - JOUR
AU - LEE, JONG MU
TI - A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ
JO - Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
PY - 2012
VL - null
IS - 61
PB - Chinese Literary Society Of Yeong Nam
SP - 403
EP - 429
SN - 1225-083X
AB - 這篇文章的主要硏究目的在於考察中國古典詩學發展史中“興”的演變過程, 以此探討“興”的詩學槪念發展趨勢和其在中國文學理論批評史上的意義。到了唐代,“興”義的發展含有社會性與諷刺性的色彩。陳子昻與白居易嘗試從“興寄”的角度來解析“興”義, 强調詩歌的政教美刺作用。到了中期, 一些有志復興儒學的文人自覺運用詩文革新來參與政治,所以在魏晉時期受到文士唾棄的美刺比興的傳統再度流行起来。這些言論反映出在唐代形成的一種追求諷諭寄託的詩風。倘若說“興寄”能代表由初唐至中唐時期“興”的詩學演變過程,那可以說代表盛唐時期“興”的演變過程便是殷璠所提的“興象”。“興象”這一詩學槪念, 實際上是由象而興和象外之興的綜合, 突破情景交融的層面, 獲得象外之境的無限意蘊的詩學境界。到了宋代, “興”義的解釋在前代多義化與複合化傾向的襄助之下, 幾乎進入了作爲詩學範疇的安定狀態。所謂“安定化”就是雖然對“興”沒有出現創新的解釋, 但它基於前代旣有的詩學成果, 增加了多義的複合的特點, 同時也作爲詩學範疇, 逐漸走向了完整的狀態。宋代對“興”的解釋中, 値得注意的有三種。其一是繼承鍾嶸的“文已盡而意有餘”的說法, 其二充實“興”本義即“起也”, 其三是“觸物以起情”的“興”。總之, “興”是在獨特的中國傳統文化四維模式下形成的。“興”注重審美主體的興發感動和偶然得之, 是物的觸動與心靈的契合雙重作用的結果, 深深地影響了中國古典詩學的範疇體系,在“興”的統攝下形成了一系列的相關範疇群, 如“感興”、“興象”、“興寄”，“興會”等。
KW -
DO - 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
ER -
LEE, JONG MU. (2012). A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 61, 403-429.
LEE, JONG MU. 2012, "A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ", Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, no.61, pp.403-429. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
LEE, JONG MU "A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature 61 pp.403-429 (2012) : 403.
LEE, JONG MU. A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ. 2012; 61 : 403-429. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
LEE, JONG MU. "A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.61(2012) : 403-429.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
LEE, JONG MU. A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature, 61, 403-429. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
LEE, JONG MU. A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ. Journal of Chinese Language and Literature. 2012; 61 403-429. doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
LEE, JONG MU. A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ. 2012; 61 : 403-429. Available from: doi:10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
LEE, JONG MU. "A study on Transition Process of “Xing(興) in Chinese Classical Literary Theory Ⅱ" Journal of Chinese Language and Literature no.61(2012) : 403-429.doi: 10.15792/clsyn..61.201212.403
