본문 바로가기
  • Home

The tendency of Sino-Korean words to become heterogeneous and the cognitive reasoning model

  • Journal of Chinese Language and Literature
  • 2026, (101), pp.233~260
  • DOI : 10.15792/clsyn..101.202604.233
  • Publisher : Chinese Literary Society Of Yeong Nam
  • Research Area : Humanities > Chinese Language and Literature
  • Received : March 20, 2026
  • Accepted : April 13, 2026
  • Published : April 30, 2026

Kim JeongPil 1

1경상국립대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study analyzed the morpheme-order structure of disyllabic Sino- Korean and Chinese words in depth, based on the principle of temporal unidimensionality and the oppositional cognitive schema. This study aimed to elucidate the heterogeneity of Sino-Korean words and the underlying cognitive differences. The main findings and implications of this study can be summarized as follows:First, the fundamental cause of the heterogeneity of Sino-Korean words lies in oppositional cognitive reasoning. The heterogeneity of “homologous” and “similar” Sino-Korean words in Korea and China is not simply limited to superficial word order differences, but is deeply rooted in the way morpheme meanings are perceived and arranged—in other words, oppositional cognitive reasoning. 1) The cognitive opposition of temporality was explained through the formation of “allo-reverse synonyms.” For example, the semantic flow shown by the reversed opposition between “運命” (fate) and “命運” (fate), was interpreted as a temporal opposition between innate (命) and acquired (運). This contrast, with Korean employing an inferential/ subjective cognition (retrograde structure, mok-sul) that emphasizes future change tendencies, creates the background for the formation of “allo-reverse synonyms.” Chinese, on the other hand, adopts an objective cognition (progressive structure, sulmok) that follows the factual, forward flow of time. 2) Cognitive opposition of dynamic and static (dynamic and static) (reverse/reverse): Within the same semantic category, Korean chose dynamic (順) while Chinese chose static (序), resulting in a pattern of “partial iso-synonyms.” This suggests that differences in the cognitive reasoning behind “dynamic and static” between Korean and Chinese influence the selection of partial morphemes. This study analyzed the morpheme-order structure of disyllabic Sino- Korean and Chinese words in depth, based on the principle of temporal unidimensionality and the oppositional cognitive schema. This study aimed to elucidate the heterogeneity of Sino-Korean words and the underlying cognitive differences.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2024 are currently being built.