본문 바로가기
  • Home

The Political Ethics of Christian Agonism in a Conflictual Society: In Dialogue with Connolly and Moltmann

  • The Korean Journal of Chiristian Social Ethics
  • Abbr : 기사윤
  • 2026, (65), pp.429~470
  • Publisher : The Society Of Korean Christian Social Ethics
  • Research Area : Humanities > Christian Theology
  • Received : July 15, 2026
  • Accepted : August 4, 2026
  • Published : August 31, 2026

Lee Sado 1

1연세대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

This study explores Christianity’s public and political responsibility in contemporary conflictual society and proposes Christian agonism as a politico-ethical model toward this end. Taking Connolly’s agonism as a critical interlocutor, the study analyzes the process through which conflict is organized antagonistically through identity/difference, evil within faith, affect, and resonance machines, and theologically reconstructs the multilayered meanings of the Greek term agon. Christian agonism consists of three forms: agon-agon, in which one contends responsibly with the other; agora-agon, which organizes public solidarity and participation; and agony-agon, which endures suffering and self-examination for the other. By testing these three forms through Moltmann’s political responsibility, eschatology of hope, and Trinitarian theology of the cross, this study proposes a political ethic through which Christianity may remain faithful to its own faith while existing as a responsible neighbor in a pluralized democratic society.

Journal Copyright Policy

BY-NC-ND 아이콘

This license enables reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only if attribution is given to the creator.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2025 are currently being built.