@article{ART002727002},
author={Suk Ja Park},
title={How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan},
journal={Journal of Popular Narrative},
issn={1738-3188},
year={2021},
volume={27},
number={2},
pages={143-177},
doi={10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005}
TY - JOUR
AU - Suk Ja Park
TI - How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan
JO - Journal of Popular Narrative
PY - 2021
VL - 27
IS - 2
PB - The Association of Popular Narrative
SP - 143
EP - 177
SN - 1738-3188
AB - In the history of Korean literature, evaluations on 『Jirisan』 (Lee Byeong-ju) are bisected. Some evaluate it as a novel of authentic records which reproduces the history before and after the emancipation objectively while others say it takes advantage of anti-communistic ideology. This study analyzes that difference is resulted not from the distinction of perspectives but from cracks in the text. This is associated with the process of 『Jirisan』’s publication. 『Jirisan』 was published serially in 『Sedae』 from 1972, and then, part of the manuscript was published in 1978 and the whole edition published in a series came to be republished in 1981. After that, in 1981 and 1985, part of the follow-up story was printed on the magazine, and then, with the memoirs of those two years as materials, the sixth and seventh volumes were again published through ‘revision’. In other words, the publication of 『Jirisan』 is divided into that of the edition published in a series and that of the edition published in 1985 including the contents of revision. The theme of the work, 『Jirisan』 differs according to the point of its completion you may think of. This researcher pays attention to the difference of perspectives between the contents up to the fifth volume and those of the sixth and seventh volumes. Particularly, his evaluation on ‘partisans’ seems to have changed. In the edition published in a series, he extended ‘partisans’ into the independence movement in the Japanese colonial era under the Revitalizing Reforms system and adopted the representation of ‘partisans’ three-dimensionally whereas in the sixth and seventh volumes, he reproduced ‘partisans’ as beings that were the ‘doctrinaire’ and ‘vicious’ ‘Reds’ and had to be punished. In brief, with 『Jirisan』, he represented ‘partisans’ in the background of history before and after the emancipation and segmented the discourse, representation and ideology of the Cold War system, but in the process of revision, he stitched up ‘partisans’ as beings that were evil and losers. Consequently, with 『Jirisan』, he revealed the process of division and contention that proceeded around anti-communism/capitalism within the abyss of the 1970’s to 80’s and reproduced ‘partisans’ as beings that were either ‘hostile (the Reds)’ or ‘unknown (losers)
KW - Korean History after Liberation; Jirisan;Partisan; the Reds;Korean War;Anti Communism;Nambugun; Momoir;Homo Sacer
DO - 10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
ER -
Suk Ja Park. (2021). How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan. Journal of Popular Narrative, 27(2), 143-177.
Suk Ja Park. 2021, "How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan", Journal of Popular Narrative, vol.27, no.2 pp.143-177. Available from: doi:10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
Suk Ja Park "How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan" Journal of Popular Narrative 27.2 pp.143-177 (2021) : 143.
Suk Ja Park. How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan. 2021; 27(2), 143-177. Available from: doi:10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
Suk Ja Park. "How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan" Journal of Popular Narrative 27, no.2 (2021) : 143-177.doi: 10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
Suk Ja Park. How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan. Journal of Popular Narrative, 27(2), 143-177. doi: 10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
Suk Ja Park. How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan. Journal of Popular Narrative. 2021; 27(2) 143-177. doi: 10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
Suk Ja Park. How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan. 2021; 27(2), 143-177. Available from: doi:10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005
Suk Ja Park. "How did ‘Partisan’ become ‘The red’: The impossibility of pain-representation in the 1970s-1980s—Focusing on Lee Byung-Ju’s 『Jirisan" Journal of Popular Narrative 27, no.2 (2021) : 143-177.doi: 10.18856/jpn.2021.27.2.005