KJCKorea
Journal Central

@article{ART002132885},
author={PARK POOJA},
title={On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century},
journal={DONAM OHMUNHAK},
issn={1229-2117},
year={2016},
volume={29},
pages={267-290},
doi={10.17056/donam.2016.29..267}

TY - JOUR
AU - PARK POOJA
TI - On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century
JO - DONAM OHMUNHAK
PY - 2016
VL - 29
IS - null
PB - The Donam Language & Literature
SP - 267
EP - 290
SN - 1229-2117
AB - The purpose of this study is to identify the reason why the aspect of change of [deo+si]>[si+deo] is shown to be different before the connective suffix ‘-ni(니)’ and ‘-ndʌin(ㄴᄃᆡᆫ)’ in 15th century Korean language. Both ‘-ndʌin’ and ‘-ni’ were grammaticalized around 13th century and came to accept the change in ‘-deo-’ combination sequence as connective suffixes upon the occurrence of change [deo+si]>[si+deo] in early 15th century. However, the difference in the process of original composition or formation of ‘-ndʌin’, which was grammaticalized in syntactic configuration of [[adnominal ending ‘-n’#bound noun ‘dʌ’] + locative case ‘ʌi’ + semantic marker ‘n’] and ‘-ni’ formed from the final ending ‘-nira’ is that apparently the connective suffix ‘-ndʌin’ was placed under the influence of the adnominal ending ‘-n’ while the connective suffix ‘-ni’ was put under the influence of the final ending ‘-nira’. Against this backdrop, the change of [deo+si]>[si+deo] before ‘-ndʌin’ seems to be closer to the aspect of change before the adnominal ending ‘-n’ rather than that before the connective suffix ‘-ni’. When it comes to the change in temproal system, however, it is noticeable that the adnominal ending ‘-n’ that features conservative aspect contrarily took the lead in change of ‘-deo-’ combination sequence. The issue of adnominal ending ‘-n’ related to the change of prefinal ending combination sequence seems to be worth further researches in the future.
KW - Syntagmatic Order of Korean Prefinal Endings;the connective suffix ‘-ni’;the connective suffix ‘-ndʌin’;adnominal ending ‘-n’;the change [deo+si]>[si+deo]
DO - 10.17056/donam.2016.29..267
ER -

PARK POOJA. (2016). On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century. DONAM OHMUNHAK, 29, 267-290.

PARK POOJA. 2016, "On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century", DONAM OHMUNHAK, vol.29, pp.267-290. Available from: doi:10.17056/donam.2016.29..267

PARK POOJA "On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century" DONAM OHMUNHAK 29 pp.267-290 (2016) : 267.

PARK POOJA. On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century. 2016; 29 267-290. Available from: doi:10.17056/donam.2016.29..267

PARK POOJA. "On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century" DONAM OHMUNHAK 29(2016) : 267-290.doi: 10.17056/donam.2016.29..267

PARK POOJA. On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century. DONAM OHMUNHAK, 29, 267-290. doi: 10.17056/donam.2016.29..267

PARK POOJA. On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century. DONAM OHMUNHAK. 2016; 29 267-290. doi: 10.17056/donam.2016.29..267

PARK POOJA. On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century. 2016; 29 267-290. Available from: doi:10.17056/donam.2016.29..267

PARK POOJA. "On the Change of Syntagmatic Order of [deo+si] Associated with Connective Suffix in 15th Century" DONAM OHMUNHAK 29(2016) : 267-290.doi: 10.17056/donam.2016.29..267