@article{ART001994346},
author={LEE SANG CHEON},
title={A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea},
journal={DONG-A LAW REVIEW},
issn={1225-3405},
year={2015},
number={67},
pages={87-120}
TY - JOUR
AU - LEE SANG CHEON
TI - A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea
JO - DONG-A LAW REVIEW
PY - 2015
VL - null
IS - 67
PB - The Institute for Legal Studies Dong-A University
SP - 87
EP - 120
SN - 1225-3405
AB - In concern with controversial compensation, there is a view that no compensation is needed for those who left the North Korea, but such a compensation according to the principle of proportionality would be needed for them. By that the Unified Korea could be called ‘nation by rule of law’ There are several patterns in concerned with land ownership system, which are called ‘land public ownership system’, ‘land public lease system’, ‘land-value public ownership system’ etc.
In concern with land ownership system as formation of land ownership pattern, the private ownership system of South Korea should be applied to the North Area.
The base of the above opinion is as following.
Firstly, the Unified Korea should not stand in the middle of both sides in view of land ownership pattern. South Korea have strong stance on its private ownership system. The middle stance would be very dangerous to swing the Unified Korea. It would make he Unified Korea fall tinto confusion.
Secondly, the private ownership system should be called as core of capitalism. A lot of theories have been developed around it. To continue the economic development after unification of Korea, the private ownership system should have firm stance on the Unified Korea of future.
Thirdly, the South and the North should have same land ownership system in time of the Unified Korea, and never have its own different land ownership system each other. Thus the North should have the private ownership system. If the North and the South have its own land ownership system each other differently, it could lead to the economic confusion and delay the economic prosperity of the Unified Korea.
Fourthly, there is a difference between constitutional law of Deutchland and that of S. Korea. It should be reflected to the realistic compensation by the Unified Korea. In concrete, the compensation by the Unified Korea is more needed for the original land owners than in case of Deutchland.
KW - land ownership system;land public ownership system;land public lease system;land-value public ownership system.
DO -
UR -
ER -
LEE SANG CHEON. (2015). A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea. DONG-A LAW REVIEW, 67, 87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON. 2015, "A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea", DONG-A LAW REVIEW, no.67, pp.87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON "A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea" DONG-A LAW REVIEW 67 pp.87-120 (2015) : 87.
LEE SANG CHEON. A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea. 2015; 67 : 87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON. "A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea" DONG-A LAW REVIEW no.67(2015) : 87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON. A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea. DONG-A LAW REVIEW, 67, 87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON. A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea. DONG-A LAW REVIEW. 2015; 67 87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON. A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea. 2015; 67 : 87-120.
LEE SANG CHEON. "A Study on Land Ownership System of Unified Korea" DONG-A LAW REVIEW no.67(2015) : 87-120.
