본문 바로가기
  • Home

Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan

  • Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature
  • Abbr : 한문고전연구
  • 2009, 19(1), pp.55-88
  • DOI : 10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
  • Publisher : The Classical Chinese Literature Association of Korea
  • Research Area : Humanities > Korean Language and Literature

Lee Gyu Pil 1

1성균관대학교

Candidate

ABSTRACT

Deasan Kim mea-sun red books extensively covering all sort of books of the day, through it, he made a minute diagnosis of academic world of Chosun. Although he was moralist and confucianist, he researched and took study more flexibly, in this process he remained 『Kwoulyeosanpil』 describing his thinking freely six volumes and three books. Kim kwi-sun(1793-1869), Deasan’s cousin, evaluated deasan’s this excellent work (『Kwoulyeosanpil』) ‘These several tens of chapters are the essential of 『Mummokpyobo』『Yugo』’ - Frankly speaking, it is no exaggeration to say that this remarks cover the whole volume of 『Kwoulyeosanpil』. There are criticisms on scholars more than ten scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty including 顧炎武, 陸隴其, 阮元 Japanese scholar 太宰純. All of them had considerable influence on academic world of the Ming⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan, Deasan remained short criticism, it was impression criticism, almost he pointed out their academic quality of them very sharply and criticize logically. This thesis researched point of view and thought of later Chosun’s confucian scholars on the bibliographical study, Buddhism the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming, through the criticism of Deasan on the scholars of the Mign⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.