@article{ART001408402},
author={Lee Gyu Pil},
title={Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan},
journal={Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature},
issn={1975-521X},
year={2009},
volume={19},
number={1},
pages={55-88},
doi={10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003}
TY - JOUR
AU - Lee Gyu Pil
TI - Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan
JO - Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature
PY - 2009
VL - 19
IS - 1
PB - The Classical Chinese Literature Association of Korea
SP - 55
EP - 88
SN - 1975-521X
AB - Deasan Kim mea-sun red books extensively covering all sort of books of the day, through it, he made a minute diagnosis of academic world of Chosun.
Although he was moralist and confucianist, he researched and took study more flexibly, in this process he remained 『Kwoulyeosanpil』 describing his thinking freely six volumes and three books.
Kim kwi-sun(1793-1869), Deasan’s cousin, evaluated deasan’s this excellent work (『Kwoulyeosanpil』) ‘These several tens of chapters are the essential of 『Mummokpyobo』『Yugo』’ - Frankly speaking, it is no exaggeration to say that this remarks cover the whole volume of 『Kwoulyeosanpil』. There are criticisms on scholars more than ten scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty including 顧炎武, 陸隴其, 阮元 Japanese scholar 太宰純.
All of them had considerable influence on academic world of the Ming⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan, Deasan remained short criticism, it was impression criticism, almost he pointed out their academic quality of them very sharply and criticize logically.
This thesis researched point of view and thought of later Chosun’s confucian scholars on the bibliographical study, Buddhism the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming, through the criticism of Deasan on the scholars of the Mign⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan.
KW - Kwoulyoesanpil;Criticism on The Ming⋅Ching Dynasty and Japan;Bibliographical study;Buddhism;the philosophy of Wang Yang-ming
DO - 10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
ER -
Lee Gyu Pil. (2009). Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 19(1), 55-88.
Lee Gyu Pil. 2009, "Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan", Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, vol.19, no.1 pp.55-88. Available from: doi:10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
Lee Gyu Pil "Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan" Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature 19.1 pp.55-88 (2009) : 55.
Lee Gyu Pil. Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan. 2009; 19(1), 55-88. Available from: doi:10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
Lee Gyu Pil. "Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan" Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature 19, no.1 (2009) : 55-88.doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
Lee Gyu Pil. Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 19(1), 55-88. doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
Lee Gyu Pil. Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature. 2009; 19(1) 55-88. doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
Lee Gyu Pil. Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan. 2009; 19(1), 55-88. Available from: doi:10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
Lee Gyu Pil. "Study on academic position Deasan based on criticism on scholars of the Ming⋅Ching dynasty and Japan" Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature 19, no.1 (2009) : 55-88.doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2009.19.1.003
