@article{ART001886066},
author={Ryu Jun Kyung},
title={The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education},
journal={Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature},
issn={1975-521X},
year={2014},
volume={28},
number={1},
pages={341-373},
doi={10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012}
TY - JOUR
AU - Ryu Jun Kyung
TI - The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education
JO - Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature
PY - 2014
VL - 28
IS - 1
PB - The Classical Chinese Literature Association of Korea
SP - 341
EP - 373
SN - 1975-521X
AB - Classical Chinese is a core element that constitutes us - cultural being, and classical Chinese education is the activity that makes us identify and use the element. In the historical development process of classical Chinese culture, Nations in East-Asia brought East Asian common norms of classical Chinese culture into existence by using classical Chinese and expanded the common norms to their own norms by strengthening and transformation of them for Middle Age. Although the official written language changed over from the classical Chinese to national written languages in each country in East Asia, the spirit and function of classical Chinese has still continued on without ceasing in each national language. So in classical Chinese education there are three things ; education to highlight East Asian common norms in classical Chinese culture, education to highlight each nation’s unique norms in the classical Chinese culture, and education to highlight the spirit and function of classical Chinese that still has continued on in each nation’s national language. Classical Chinese education must be conducted in direction of emphasis on East common norms as well as on each nation’s unique norms for overcoming ultra-nationalism in East Asia.
KW - Classical Chinese education;Classical Chinese curriculum;Common written language;Diglossia
DO - 10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
ER -
Ryu Jun Kyung. (2014). The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 28(1), 341-373.
Ryu Jun Kyung. 2014, "The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education", Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, vol.28, no.1 pp.341-373. Available from: doi:10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
Ryu Jun Kyung "The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education" Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature 28.1 pp.341-373 (2014) : 341.
Ryu Jun Kyung. The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education. 2014; 28(1), 341-373. Available from: doi:10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
Ryu Jun Kyung. "The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education" Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature 28, no.1 (2014) : 341-373.doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
Ryu Jun Kyung. The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature, 28(1), 341-373. doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
Ryu Jun Kyung. The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education. Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature. 2014; 28(1) 341-373. doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
Ryu Jun Kyung. The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education. 2014; 28(1), 341-373. Available from: doi:10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
Ryu Jun Kyung. "The nature and aim of the classical Chinese education" Journal of Korean Classical Chinese Literature 28, no.1 (2014) : 341-373.doi: 10.18213/jkccl.2014.28.1.012
