본문 바로가기
  • Home

Ordinary Citizens as Realists: How do Americans Assess Threat?

  • Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Abbr :
  • 2020, 63(2), pp.5-24
  • DOI : 10.17939/hushss.2020.63.2.001
  • Publisher : Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Research Area : Interdisciplinary Studies > Interdisciplinary Research
  • Received : March 30, 2020
  • Accepted : May 25, 2020
  • Published : May 31, 2020

Seok Joon Kim 1

1고려대학교

Accredited

ABSTRACT

How do ordinary citizens assess threats posed by a rival state? International relations scholars, particularly realists, provide important insights into ordinary citizens’ threat assessment. Based on a survey experiment that utilizes a representative sample of U.S. citizens, this study examines how ordinary U.S. citizens assess a rival state’s threat. This study finds that instead of using all the information available, ordinary citizens utilize information about both state power and intentions heuristically for threat assessment. As a result, U.S. citizens respond as though they were offensive realists under certain conditions (when uncertainty about a strong state’s intentions is high), while they respond as though they were defensive (motivational) realists under some other conditions (when uncertainty about a strong state’s intentions is low). This study makes a theoretical contribution to the existing scholarship by empirically testing at the micro level the baseline assumption of realists of international relations over the role of a state’s intentions in threat assessment.

Citation status

* References for papers published after 2023 are currently being built.