@article{ART002130786},
author={Kwon, eesun},
title={An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - },
journal={PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE},
issn={1975-1621},
year={2016},
number={22},
pages={1-27},
doi={10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001}
TY - JOUR
AU - Kwon, eesun
TI - An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System -
JO - PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE
PY - 2016
VL - null
IS - 22
PB - Research Institute for East-West Thought
SP - 1
EP - 27
SN - 1975-1621
AB - In the introduction of the first edition[A], Kant defined the Critique of Reason as ‘A Court of Justice’ and denoted as ‘The True Court of Justice’. I hope to elucidate and examine the essence of “Critique” in the context of a court system. By examining the Critique in the context of a court system, or more specifically, focusing on the duty of the court of justice, we can explore the basis of Critique. In order to do so, we must first confirm that Critique of Pure Reason is a court; second we must understand why it is indeed viewed as a court and finally we must identify that a court system inevitably arises from the duty of a Court of Reason. Next, we will discuss that the establishment of Critique of Pure Reason should be regarded as a momentous duty in the historic context of philosophical reasoning, and that such establishment marks the turnaround of the basis of my argument. Lastly, I will show the relationship between the inherent duty of a court of Reason and a transcendental cognition, then inquire about the meaning of its relationship. By appreciating the establishment of a court based upon the characters of Critique of Pure Reason and its inherent duty, the entirety of Critique will be better elucidated.
KW - Kant;Critique of Reason;a Model of Court System;Self-Knowledge;Transcendental
DO - 10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
ER -
Kwon, eesun. (2016). An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - . PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, 22, 1-27.
Kwon, eesun. 2016, "An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - ", PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, no.22, pp.1-27. Available from: doi:10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
Kwon, eesun "An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - " PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE 22 pp.1-27 (2016) : 1.
Kwon, eesun. An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - . 2016; 22 : 1-27. Available from: doi:10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
Kwon, eesun. "An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - " PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE no.22(2016) : 1-27.doi: 10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
Kwon, eesun. An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - . PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE, 22, 1-27. doi: 10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
Kwon, eesun. An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - . PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE. 2016; 22 1-27. doi: 10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
Kwon, eesun. An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - . 2016; 22 : 1-27. Available from: doi:10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
Kwon, eesun. "An Examination of Kant’s Idea of ‘a Court of Reason’ - Appreciation of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as a Model of Court System - " PHILOSOPHY·THOUGHT·CULTURE no.22(2016) : 1-27.doi: 10.33639/ptc.2016..22.001
